Energy and exergy analysis of chemical looping combustion technology and comparison with pre-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion technologies for CO2 capture

被引:104
作者
Mukherjee, Sanjay [1 ]
Kumar, Prashant [1 ]
Yang, Aidong [2 ]
Fennell, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | 2015年 / 3卷 / 03期
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Coal power plants; CO2; capture; Chemical looping combustion; Exergy analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2015.07.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted from conventional coal-based power plants is a growing concern for the environment. Chemical looping combustion (CLC), pre-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion are promising CO2 capture technologies which allow clean electricity generation from coal in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. This work compares the characteristics of the above three capture technologies to those of a conventional IGCC plant without CO2 capture. CLC technology is also investigated for two different process configurations-(i) an integrated gasification combined cycle coupled with chemical looping combustion (IGCC-CLC), and (ii) coal direct chemical looping combustion (CDCLC)-using exergy analysis to exploit the complete potential of CLC. Power output, net electrical efficiency and CO2 capture efficiency are the key parameters investigated for the assessment. Flowsheet models of five different types of IGCC power plants, (four with and one without CO2 capture), were developed in the Aspen plus simulation package. The results indicate that with respect to conventional IGCC power plant, IGCC-CLC exhibited an energy penalty of 4.5%, compared with 7.1% and 9.1% for precombustion and oxy-fuel combustion technologies, respectively. IGCC-CLC and oxy-fuel combustion technologies achieved an overall CO2 capture rate of similar to 100% whereas pre-combustion technology could capture similar to 94.8%. Modification of IGCC-CLC into CDCLC tends to increase the net electrical efficiency by 4.7% while maintaining 100% CO2 capture rate. A detailed exergy analysis performed on the two CLC process configurations (IGCC-CLC and CDCLC) and conventional IGCC process demonstrates that CLC technology can be thermodynamically as efficient as a conventional IGCC process. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
引用
收藏
页码:2104 / 2114
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Progress in Chemical-Looping Combustion and Reforming technologies [J].
Adanez, Juan ;
Abad, Alberto ;
Garcia-Labiano, Francisco ;
Gayan, Pilar ;
de Diego, Luis F. .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2012, 38 (02) :215-282
[2]   Prospects for carbon capture and storage technologies [J].
Anderson, S ;
Newell, R .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2004, 29 :109-142
[3]   Exergy analysis of chemical-looping combustion systems [J].
Anheden, M ;
Svedberg, G .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 39 (16-18) :1967-1980
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COST PERFORMANCE CAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, CO2 EM FUEL COMB
[6]   An Extended Pinch Analysis and Design procedure utilizing pressure based exergy for subambient cooling [J].
Aspelund, Audun ;
Berstad, David Olsson ;
Gundersen, Truls .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (16) :2633-2649
[7]  
Aspentech, 2010, PHYS PROP METH ASP P
[8]  
Aspentech, PHYS PROP METH MOD A, V11
[9]   Experimental evaluation and modeling of steam gasification and hydrogen inhibition in Chemical-Looping Combustion with solid fuel [J].
Azimi, Golnar ;
Keller, Martin ;
Mehdipoor, Amin ;
Leion, Henrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 11 :1-10
[10]   Carbon capture and storage update [J].
Boot-Handford, M. E. ;
Abanades, J. C. ;
Anthony, E. J. ;
Blunt, M. J. ;
Brandani, S. ;
Mac Dowell, N. ;
Fernandez, J. R. ;
Ferrari, M. -C. ;
Gross, R. ;
Hallett, J. P. ;
Haszeldine, R. S. ;
Heptonstall, P. ;
Lyngfelt, A. ;
Makuch, Z. ;
Mangano, E. ;
Porter, R. T. J. ;
Pourkashanian, M. ;
Rochelle, G. T. ;
Shah, N. ;
Yao, J. G. ;
Fennell, P. S. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2014, 7 (01) :130-189