Examining a Grade-Level Math CBM Designed for Persistently Low-Performing Students

被引:6
作者
Anderson, Daniel [1 ]
Lai, Cheng-Fei [1 ]
Alonzo, Julie [1 ]
Tindal, Gerald [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10627197.2011.551084
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Students with disabilities participate in two major measurement systems. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act emphasizes working within a Response to Intervention (RTI) framework to identify and monitor the progress of low-performing students. Persistent low-performing students also may be eligible for some form of an alternate assessment for accountability purposes. Working within these two systems, educators need technically sound measures to inform decision making. This study presents scaling results from a Curriculum Based Measurement tool designed within an RTI framework and specifically for persistently low-performing students. We use the phrase "persistently low-performing students" to refer to a specific group of students who have been identified with a nonsevere learning disability and who perform well below grade-level expectations. Key findings indicate that items appear to function well in the lower tail of the distribution of students' estimated ability level. Further, the distribution of items is positively skewed, resulting in many accessible items that are most informative for low-performing students. Results provide initial validity evidence for the measurements as one source of data for progress monitoring within an RTI framework and the identification of persistent low-performing students who may be eligible for a large-scale assessment option other than the general grade-level assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 34
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Anderson D., 2009, 0915 U OR BEH RES TE
[2]   Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services [J].
Ardoin, SP ;
Witt, JC ;
Connell, JE ;
Koenig, JL .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2005, 23 (04) :362-380
[3]  
Bond T.G., 2007, APPL RASCH MODEL FUN, V2nd Edn., DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410614575
[4]   Progress Monitoring in Reading Using Curriculum-Based Measurement in a Response-to-Intervention Model [J].
Busch, Todd W. ;
Reschly, Amy L. .
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2007, 32 (04) :223-230
[5]   Curriculum-Based Measurement of Math Computation [J].
Christ, Theodore J. ;
Scullin, Sarah ;
Tolbize, Anick ;
Jiban, Cynthia L. .
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION, 2008, 33 (04) :198-205
[6]  
Deno S. L., 1977, DATA BASED PROGRAM M
[7]   Developments in curriculum-based measurement [J].
Deno, SL .
JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (03) :184-192
[8]   CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT - THE EMERGING ALTERNATIVE [J].
DENO, SL .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1985, 52 (03) :219-232
[9]  
Dolan R., 2005, J TECHNOLOGY LEARNIN, V3
[10]  
Feldt L.S., 1989, ED MEASUREMENT, P105