DNA flow cytometric analysis in variable types of hydropic placentas

被引:0
作者
Pasdar, Fatemeh Atabaki [1 ]
Khooei, Alireza [2 ]
Fazel, Alireza [3 ]
Rastin, Maryam [4 ]
Tabasi, Nafise [4 ]
Peirouvi, Tahmineh [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Mahmoud [4 ]
机构
[1] Urmia Univ Med Sci, Dept Anat Sci, Orumiyeh, Iran
[2] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Imam Reza Hosp, Dept Pathol, Mashhad, Iran
[3] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, Mashhad, Iran
[4] Mashhad Univ Med Sci, BuAli Res Inst, Immunol Res Ctr, Mashhad, Iran
关键词
Flow cytometry; Hydatidiform mole; Spontaneous abortion; Ploidy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Differential diagnosis between complete hydatidiform mole, partial hydatidiform mole and hydropic abortion, known as hydropic placentas is still a challenge for pathologists but it is very important for patient management. Objective: We analyzed the nuclear DNA content of various types of hydropic Placentas by flowcytometry. Materials and Methods: DNA ploidy analysis was performed in 20 non-molar (hydropic and non-hydropic spontaneous abortions) and 20 molar (complete and partial moles) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples by flow cytometry. The criteria for selection were based on the histopathologic diagnosis. Results: Of 10 cases histologically diagnosed as complete hydatiform mole, 9 cases Yielded diploid histograms, and 1 case was tetraploid. Of 10 partial hydatidiform moles, 8 were triploid and 2 were diploid. All of 2(1) cases diagnosed as spontaneous abortions (hydropie and non-hydropic) yielded diploid histograms. Conclusion: These findings signify the importance of the combined.. use of conventional histology and Ploidy analysis in the differential diagnosis of complete hydatidiform mole, partial hydatidiform mole and hydropic abortion.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 274
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Pathology of gestational trophoblastic disease [J].
Bentley, RC .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 46 (03) :513-522
[2]   Current management of gestational trophoblastic diseases [J].
Berkowitz, Ross S. ;
Goldstein, Donald P. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 112 (03) :654-662
[3]   INCIDENCE AND ETIOLOGY OF HYDATIDIFORM MOLE - AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL REVIEW [J].
BRACKEN, MB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (12) :1123-1135
[4]   FLOW CYTOMETRIC STUDIES IN SPONTANEOUS-ABORTIONS - APPLICATIONS IN THE MEDICOLEGAL PRACTICE [J].
CERA, G ;
FRUTTERO, A ;
RUA, S ;
COMINO, A ;
ABRATE, M .
FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 54 (02) :167-175
[5]   Refining the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole:: image ploidy analysis and p57KIP2 immunohistochemistry [J].
Crisp, H ;
Burton, JL ;
Stewart, R ;
Wells, M .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 43 (04) :363-373
[6]  
Cunningham F, 2010, WILLIAMS OBSTET, P856
[7]  
FUKUNAGA M, 1993, MODERN PATHOL, V6, P353
[8]   Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the diagnosis of hydatidiform mole [J].
Fukunaga, M ;
Katabuchi, HA ;
Nagasaka, T ;
Mikami, Y ;
Minamiguchi, S ;
Lage, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (07) :942-947
[9]   Flow cytometric and clinicopathologic study of complete hydatidiform moles with special reference to the significance of cytometric aneuploidy [J].
Fukunaga, M .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :67-70
[10]  
Fukunaga M, 1996, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V120, P569