CROP AND TILLAGE ROTATIONS - GRAIN-YIELD, RESIDUE COVER, AND SOIL-WATER

被引:33
作者
WAGGER, MG [1 ]
DENTON, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE, DEPT PLANT & SOIL SCI, KNOXVILLE, TN 37901 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600040037x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Information regarding crop yield response for different tillage and rotation systems is needed to determine regional or local suitability for a given production system. Our objective was to determine the effects of continuous and alternating tillage sequences in corn (Zea mays L.) monoculture and corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation on residue cover, soil water, and grain yield. Continuous conventional tillage (CT), continuous no-tillage (NT), or CT and NT alternating every other year were evaluated during a 5-yr period on a Rion (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Typic Hapludult)-Pacolet (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult) sandy clay loam complex at a Piedmont location and an Eunola sandy loam (fine-loamy, siliceous, thermic Aquic Hapludult) at a Coastal Plain location. The 5-yr average NT corn grain yield was 27% (1.15 Mg ha-1) higher than CT at the Piedmont location, but only 4% (0.32 Mg ha-1) higher at the Coastal Plain location. Continuous Nt at the Piedmont location also resulted in higher corn yields 2 out of 4 yr compared with NT following CT. The increase in corn yield with NT was associated with greater soil water availability, primarily attributed to surface residue cover from corn stover fostering greater infiltration on a crust-prone soil. Soybean yield during the 5-yr period was 5% higher with NT at the Piedmont location and unaffected by tillage at the Coastal Plain location. In general, crop rotation had no effect on corn yield at either location. Results indicate that continuous NT should be the system of choice on this upland Piedmont soil.
引用
收藏
页码:1233 / 1237
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EFFECT OF CROPPING SYSTEMS AND NITROGEN LEVELS ON CORN (ZEA-MAYS) YIELDS IN SOUTHERN PIEDMONT REGION [J].
ADAMS, WE ;
MORRIS, HD ;
DAWSON, RN .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1970, 62 (05) :655-+
[3]  
Blake G.R., 1986, AGRON MONOGR, V5, P363, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C13
[4]   CORN RESIDUE EFFECT ON THE YIELD OF CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWN IN ROTATION [J].
CROOKSTON, RK ;
KURLE, JE .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1989, 81 (02) :229-232
[5]   CONTINUOUS TILLAGE AND ROTATION COMBINATIONS EFFECTS ON CORN, SOYBEAN, AND OAT YIELDS [J].
DICK, WA ;
VANDOREN, DM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1985, 77 (03) :459-465
[6]   INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE AND CROP-ROTATION ON YIELDS OF CORN, SOYBEAN, AND WHEAT [J].
EDWARDS, JH ;
THURLOW, DL ;
EASON, JT .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1988, 80 (01) :76-80
[7]   PHENOLIC ACIDS IN OATS WHEAT SORGHUM AND CORN RESIDUES AND THEIR PHYTOTOXICITY [J].
GUENZI, WD ;
MCCALLA, TM .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1966, 58 (03) :303-&
[8]  
HAIRSTON JE, 1984, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V39, P391
[9]   EFFECTS OF TILLAGE, NO TILLAGE, AND MULCH ON SOIL WATER AND PLANT GROWTH [J].
JONES, JN ;
MOODY, JE ;
LILLARD, JH .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1969, 61 (05) :719-&
[10]   CORN SOYBEAN ROTATION EFFECT AS INFLUENCED BY TILLAGE, NITROGEN, AND HYBRID CULTIVAR [J].
MEESE, BG ;
CARTER, PR ;
OPLINGER, ES ;
PENDLETON, JW .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (01) :74-80