A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETERMINING TOTAL-BODY PROTEIN

被引:47
作者
BROOKS, SPJ
LAMPI, BJ
SARWAR, G
BOTTING, HG
机构
[1] Nutrition Research Division, 3W Banting Research Centre, Ottawa, ON K1A 0L2, Tunney's Pasture
关键词
D O I
10.1006/abio.1995.1186
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to find the optimal method (with respect to convenience and accuracy) for determining total protein in whole-body homogenates of rats. Three different protein extraction methods and five different protein concentration methods were assessed. The results were compared against a reference value measured by complete amino acid analysis after acid hydrolysis. The data demonstrated that extraction with 5% (w/v) sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) in 0.5 N NaOH was far superior to that with water alone or to 6 N guanidine-HCl. A comparison of the Biuret, Bradford, and bicinchoninic acid methods on the SDS-NaOH-extracted samples showed that the Biuret method was optimal, giving a value that was 90% of the reference value with a small variation (2.4% of the mean). The Kjeldahl method gave the correct protein concentration only when a nitrogen factor of 5.51 +/- 0.03 (N = 5) was applied, The results suggest that extraction with SDS-NaOH followed by the Biuret procedure is a good method for measuring protein concentrations in whole body rat homogenates. (C) 1995 AcademicPress,Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[3]  
BROOKS SPJ, 1992, BIOTECHNIQUES, V13, P906
[4]   LINEAR LOWRY-FOLIN ASSAY FOR BOTH WATER-SOLUBLE AND SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE-SOLUBILIZED PROTEINS [J].
HESS, HH ;
LEES, MB ;
DERR, JE .
ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1978, 85 (01) :295-300
[5]  
HUGLI TE, 1972, J BIOL CHEM, V247, P2828
[6]  
KRESZE GB, 1983, METHOD ENZYMAT AN, V2, P86
[7]  
LOWRY OH, 1951, J BIOL CHEM, V193, P265
[9]  
PETERSON GL, 1983, METHOD ENZYMOL, V91, P95