An integrated approach to assessing the sustainability of buildings

被引:20
作者
Hassan, Osama A. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Sci & Technol, Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
Sustainable construction; Built environment research; Composite indicator; Built environment; Sustainable development; Construction management; Sustainability criteria; Indicators; Measurement and practices; Building sustainability; Value-focused thinking;
D O I
10.1108/JEDT-12-2014-0077
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to advance a model that relates the criteria of sustainable development with the construction engineering of buildings. Moreover, a method to evaluate the building sustainability is suggested. Design/methodology/approach - The method is based on calculating the weighted expected utility function of a building with respect to composite indicator. Findings - Based on this integrated approach, a tentative index to evaluate the sustainability of buildings is proposed. Research limitations/implications - The study is limited to the assessment of the sustainable development of the built environment. Practical implications - The feasibility of assessing the sustainability of a building using the sustainable index of buildings (SIB) is that it permits the decision-makers to study the potential improvement in the sustainable development of buildings in the long and short run. Moreover, the role of benchmarking in improving the sustainability performance of buildings is discussed in view of the suggested method. Social implications - The present method is practical and easy to use for ranking building (or a part of a building) according to the sustainable performance. Originality/value - New methodology based on integrating the value-focused thinking together with the composite indicators is used to evaluate the sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 850
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: Aggregated sustainability indices
    Kamali, Mohammad
    Hewage, Kasun
    Milani, Abbas S.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 138 : 21 - 41
  • [32] An approach to assessing sustainability integration in strategic decision systems for product development
    Hallstedt, Sophie
    Ny, Henrik
    Robert, Karl-Henrik
    Broman, Goran
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (08) : 703 - 712
  • [33] Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) approach in buildings renovation for the sustainability of the built environment: A review
    Kylili, Angeliki
    Fokaides, Paris A.
    Lopez Jimenez, Petra Amparo
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 : 906 - 915
  • [34] Vernacular Farm Buildings and Rural Landscape: A Geospatial Approach for Their Integrated Management
    Cillis, Giuseppe
    Statuto, Dina
    Picuno, Pietro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [35] A New Integrated Framework for Stakeholder Involvement in Sustainability Policymaking - A Multidisciplinary Approach
    Kua, Harn Wei
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 24 (05) : 281 - 297
  • [36] Multiple-Criteria Methods for Assessing Social Sustainability in the Built Environment: A Systematic Review
    Passos Neto, George da Mota
    Alencar, Luciana Hazin
    Valdes-Vasquez, Rodolfo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (23)
  • [37] Integrated Management Approach Towards Sustainability: An Egyptian Business Case Study
    Vitale, Gianluca
    Cupertino, Sebastiano
    Rinaldi, Loredana
    Riccaboni, Angelo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [38] Assessing the Sustainability Performance of Sustainability Management Software
    Kern, Eva
    Silva, Samanthi
    Guldner, Achim
    TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 6 (03):
  • [39] Assessing enablers of green entrepreneurship in circular economy: An integrated approach
    Mondal, Sourav
    Singh, Saumya
    Gupta, Himanshu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 388
  • [40] IoT for Certified Sustainability in Smart Buildings
    Taha, Abd-Elhamid M.
    Elabd, Aliaa
    IEEE NETWORK, 2021, 35 (04): : 241 - 247