EVALUATION OF AN INDIRECT ELISA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE BRUCELLOSIS

被引:18
作者
UZAL, FA
CARRASCO, AE
ECHAIDE, S
NIELSEN, K
ROBLES, CA
机构
[1] NATL INST AGING TECHNOL,ANIM HLTH UNIT,RA-2300 SANTA FE,ARGENTINA
[2] AGR CANADA,ANIM DIS RES INST,NEPEAN,ON K2H 8P9,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/104063879500700408
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Control and eradication of bovine brucellosis is usually based on the serological detection of antibodies. In Argentina, the rose bengal test (RE) and the buffered plate antigen test (BPA) are the 2 screening tests officially recognized, whereas the 2-mercaptoethanol test (2ME) and the tube agglutination test (SAT) are the confirmatory assays currently in use. In order to improve the serological diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Patagonia, Argentina, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) kit distributed by the International Atomic Energy Agency was evaluated. Sera from negative nonvaccinated, negative but vaccinated, and positive animals were tested by all the above techniques. The specificity of the I-ELISA (98.9% and 97.2%) was similar to that of the BPA, RE, 2ME and complement fixation (CF) tests when used to test sera from negative nonvaccinated and negative but vaccinated animals, respectively. The sensitivity of the I-ELISA (98.7%) was higher than the BPA test (96.1%) and the CF test (95.2%). The I-ELISA kit evaluated in this study was thought to be a valuable tool for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the Patagonia region where little epidemiological information is available about this disease, and where large numbers of sera should be tested to obtain such information.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 475
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Alton G.G., Jones L.M., Angus R.D., Verger J.M., Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory., (1988)
[2]  
Alton G.G., Jones L.M., Pietz D.E., Laboratory techniques in brucellosis, Series de monografia 55, (1975)
[3]  
Angus R.D., Barton C.E., The production and evaluation of buffered plate antigen for use in a presumptive test for brucellosis, Develop Biol Standard, 56, pp. 349-356, (1984)
[4]  
Sexto informe., (1986)
[5]  
MacMillan A., Conventional serological test, Animal brucellosis, eds., pp. 153-197, (1990)
[6]  
Marino O., Gallego M.M.I., de Leon L.S., Almansa M.J., Comparación de técnicas serologicas en la evaluatión de bovinos infectados naturalmente por Brucella abortus, Networking in brucellosis research, ed., pp. 120-130, (1991)
[7]  
Nielsen K.H., Wright P.F., Kelly W.A., Cherwonogrodzky J.H., A review of enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus, Vet Immunol Immunopath, 18, pp. 331-347, (1988)
[8]  
Stemshom B.W., Forbes L.B., Eaglesome M.D., Nielsen K.H., Et al., A comparison of standard serological test for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Canada, Can J Comp Med, 49, pp. 391-394, (1985)