There are no qualitative methods - nor quantitative for that matter: the misleading rhetoric of the qualitative-quantitative argument

被引:8
作者
Asberg, Rodney [1 ]
Hummerdal, Daniel [2 ]
Dekker, Sidney [3 ]
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Dept Educ, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Ecole Mines Paris, Ctr Rech Risques & Crises, Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] Griffith Univ, Key Ctr Eth Law Justice & Governance, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
qualitative; quantitative; ontology; epistemology; critical theory; method;
D O I
10.1080/1464536X.2011.559292
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This article is about the comprehensive but meaningless rhetoric encircling the pseudo issue of quantitative-qualitative method. Two questions get clarification in this article. First, what does the term method mean, and second, what constraints should be attached to the term when moving into the theory and practice of science. Based on an examination of these two, we subsequently address the question of what the quantitative-qualitative argument is about. Our reasoning leads to the conclusion that the quantitative-qualitative argument should be removed from the agenda, so that significant and important a priori choices may be given due attention instead.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 415
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1958, ADV LEARNERS DICT
[2]  
Comte A., 1979, OM POSITIVISMEN
[3]  
Denzin N. K., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES
[4]  
Denzin N. K., 2000, LANDSCAPE QUALITATIV
[5]  
Desnoyers L., 2004, THEOR ISSUES ERGON S, V5, P495
[6]  
Feyerabend P., 1993, METHOD
[7]  
Flyvbjerg B., 2001, MAKING SOCIAL SCI MA, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511810503
[8]  
Giddens A., 1984, CONSTITUTION SOC OUT
[9]  
HARTMAN J, 1998, VETENSKAPLIGT TANKAN
[10]  
Holme I., 1991, FORSKNINGSMETODIK KV