Corporate risk management and investment decisions

被引:9
作者
Li, Xun [1 ]
Wu, Zhenyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Appl Math, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, N Murray Edwards Sch Business, Dept Finance & Management Sci, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
关键词
Corporate strategy; Risk management; Investment appraisal; Capital budgeting;
D O I
10.1108/15265940910938233
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - Corporate risk management is one of the critical concerns of managers when they make investment allocation decisions among multiple projects. The purpose of this paper is to address corporate investment issues illustrated by target-beating in capital budgeting, and further discuss their applications in financial management, especially in venture capital finance. Design/methodology/approach - Value-at-risk, a typical down-side risk measure which is considered more appropriate for economic agents, is applied to the analysis. Probability theory and optimal control methodologies are used to derive analytical solutions. Findings - By maximizing the probability of beating a pre-determined target, an analytical optimal corporate investment allocation strategy is presented, and the corresponding probability and expected earliest time of success derived. Research limitations/implications - Various types of utility functions of economic agents and other dynamic downside risk measures can be considered in future research along this line. Practical implications - This paper paves the road for applications of continuous-time downside risk in making corporate investment decisions, especially in the field of new venture finance. Originality/value - As one of the early studies investigating optimal investment decisions in continuous-time downside risk-based capital budgeting system, this project sheds light on corporate risk management, and provides risk-averse decision makers with an effective tool.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 168
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, THESIS
[2]  
Browne S., 1999, FINANC STOCH, V3, P275, DOI DOI 10.1007/S007800050063
[3]  
Duffie D., 1991, ANN APPL PROBAB, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1214/AOAP/1177005978
[4]  
Duffie D., 1997, J DERIV, V4, P7, DOI DOI 10.3905/jod.1997.407971
[5]  
Ikeda N., 1989, STOCHASTIC DIFFERENT, V24
[6]   Continuous-time mean-variance efficiencythe 80% rule [J].
Li, Xun ;
Zhou, Xun Yu .
ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2006, 16 (04) :1751-1763
[7]  
LO A, 1999, FINANCIAL ANAL J, V55, P13, DOI DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V55.N1.2238
[8]  
Markowitz H., 1971, PORTFOLIO SELECTION
[9]   INTERTEMPORAL CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL [J].
MERTON, RC .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (05) :867-887
[10]  
Salminen P., 2002, HDB BROWNIAN MOTION