UNCERTAINTY IN A TRANSITIONAL ECONOMY: THE CASE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN THE 1990S

被引:3
作者
Soukup, Marek [1 ]
Rozmainsky, Ivan V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] St Petersburg State Univ, Natl Res Univ, Smolny Coll, Fac Liberal Arts & Sci,Higher Sch Econ, St Petersburg, Russia
来源
TERRA ECONOMICUS | 2018年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
Post Keynesian economics; uncertainty; risk; Czechia; economy in transition; institutions;
D O I
10.23683/2073-6606-2018-16-1-56-73
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper is concerned with the role of uncertainty in an economy undergoing an economic transition. We aim especially at the uncertainty of the Keynesian type. First, a framework for classifying different views on uncertainty is constructed based on literature dedicated to various types of uncertainty. We define risk, as it is commonly adopted in the mainstream economics and uncertainty, outlined by Knight and Keynes and worked up by the Post Keynesians, although for mainstream approach these two concepts are synonymous. This framework is subsequently applied on two cases of decision-making, which appeared during the transition process in the Czech Republic. We show that some important phenomena in Czechia in the 1990s took place under conditions of fundamental or ontological uncertainty. In particular, it was the voucher privatization and Tosovsky dilemma that fit the definition formulated before. Further, potential recommendations for economic policy emerging from the presence of uncertainty are outlined, and their aptness for the Czech transition process is evaluated. We demonstrate that certain outcomes could have been significantly better had the Czech government taken the aspect of uncertainty into account. Hence, we give real-life reasons for fundamental uncertainty being taken seriously and incorporated into economic theory or at least economic policy.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 73
页数:18
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO THE THEORY OF CHOICE IN RISK-TAKING SITUATIONS [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
ECONOMETRICA, 1951, 19 (04) :404-437
[2]  
Czech National Bank, 2017, ANN REP CZECH NAT BA
[3]  
Czech Statistical Bureau, 2018, RES EL REF
[4]  
Czech Television, 2010, 13 CHAMB VALTR KOM
[5]  
Dedek O., 2000, POLITICKA EKONOMIE, V6
[6]   Bounded rationality, institutions, and uncertainty [J].
Dequech, D .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2001, 35 (04) :911-929
[7]   A stages approach to banking development in transition economies [J].
Dow, Sheila C. ;
Ghosh, Dipak ;
Ruziev, Kobil .
JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2008, 31 (01) :3-33
[8]   Eichnerian megacorp and investment behaviour of Russian corporations [J].
Dzarasov, Ruslan .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2011, 35 (01) :199-217
[9]   The Post Keynesian alternative for the Russian economy [J].
Dzarasov, Soltan S. .
JOURNAL OF POST KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS, 2010, 33 (01) :17-40
[10]  
Glickman M., 2003, ELGAR COMPANION POST, P366