A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous Research Guidelines to Inform Genomic Research in Indigenous Communities

被引:19
作者
Taniguchi, Nicole K. [1 ]
Taualii, Maile [1 ]
Maddock, Jay [2 ]
机构
[1] Papa Ola Lokahi, Native Hawaiian Epidemiol Ctr, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Off Publ Hlth Studies, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
genetic research; genomic research; Indigenous communities;
D O I
10.18584/iipj.2012.3.1.6
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Genetic research has potential benefits for improving health, such as identifying molecular characteristics of a disease, understanding disease prevalence and treatment, and developing treatments tailored to patients based on individual genetic characteristics of their disease. Indigenous people are often targeted for genetic research because genes are easier to study in communities that practice endogamy. Therefore, populations perceived to be more homogenous, such as Indigenous peoples, are ideal for genetic studies. While Indigenous communities remain the focal point of many genomic studies, some result in harm and unethical practice. Unfortunately, the harms of poorly formulated and unethical research involving Indigenous people have created barriers to participation that prevent critical and lifesaving research. These harms have led a number of Indigenous communities to develop guidelines for engaging with researchers to assist in safely bridging the gap between genetic research and Indigenous peoples. SPECIFIC AIMS: The specific aims of this study were: (1) to conduct an international review and comparison of Indigenous research guidelines that highlight topics regarding genetics and use of biological samples and identify commonalities and differences among ethical principles of concern to Indigenous peoples; and (2) develop policy recommendations for Indigenous populations interested in creating formal policies around the use of genetic information and protection of biological samples using data from specific aim 1. METHODS: A comparative analysis was performed to identify best research practices and recommendations for Indigenous groups from four countries: Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. The analysis examined commonalities in political relationships, which support self-determination among these Indigenous communities to control their data. Current international Indigenous guidelines were analyzed to review processes of how genetic research is conducted and the use of biological samples is handled with Indigenous peoples. RESULTS: Results suggest the need for genetic and genomic research policies for the world's Indigenous people. Indigenous groups are most vulnerable to research exploitation and harm; therefore, identifying principles that work for Indigenous people will lead to best practices for all populations. CONCLUSIONS: Development and implementation of best practices informed by research guidelines in Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and the U.S. may be helpful to advise Indigenous leaders, policy makers, and researchers to the proper conduction of genetic research within Indigenous communities. Comparative analyses are a useful tool for identifying areas for further work in developing genetic research policy for Indigenous communities. OUTCOME: The outcomes of this analysis are relevant and useful to Indigenous communities and inform the development of community-based genetic research guidelines. The recommendations can be used in designing appropriate policies for future genomic research with Indigenous peoples.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [31] A values-centered relational science model: supporting Indigenous rights and reconciliation in research
    David-Chavez, Dominique M.
    Gavin, Michael C.
    Ortiz, Norma
    Valdez, Shelly
    Carroll, Stephanie Russo
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 29 (02):
  • [32] From biocolonialism to emancipation: considerations on ethical and culturally respectful omics research with indigenous Australians
    Soares, Gustavo H.
    Hedges, Joanne
    Sethi, Sneha
    Poirier, Brianna
    Jamieson, Lisa
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 26 (03) : 487 - 496
  • [33] Aligning Intentions with Community: Graduate Students Reflect on Collaborative Methodologies with Indigenous Research Partners
    Wray, Kristine
    Soukhaphon, Akarath
    Parlee, Brenda
    D'Souza, Amabel
    Freitas, Carolina
    Heredia, Iria
    Martin, Chelsea
    Oloriz, Carrie
    Proverbs, Tracey
    Spicer, Neal
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [34] A quantitative analysis of drinking water advisories in Saskatchewan Indigenous and rural communities 2012-2016
    McLeod, Lianne
    Bharadwaj, Lalita Anne
    Daigle, Joanne
    Waldner, Cheryl
    Bradford, Lori Elisabet Ann
    CANADIAN WATER RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (04) : 345 - 357
  • [35] Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes
    Carroll, Stephanie Russo
    Garba, Ibrahim
    Plevel, Rebecca
    Small-Rodriguez, Desi
    Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y.
    Hudson, Maui
    Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [36] Techno-economic feasibility analysis of photovoltaic systems in remote areas for indigenous communities in the Colombian Guajira
    Vides-Prado, Andres
    Ojeda Camargo, Edgar
    Vides-Prado, Carlos
    Herrera Orozco, Israel
    Chenlo, Faustino
    Candelo, John E.
    Barrios Sarmiento, Agustin
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 4245 - 4255
  • [37] Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: a content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries
    Jantina de Vries
    Syntia Nchangwi Munung
    Alice Matimba
    Sheryl McCurdy
    Odile Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer
    Ciara Staunton
    Aminu Yakubu
    Paulina Tindana
    BMC Medical Ethics, 18
  • [38] Genomic Research and American Indian Tribal Communities in Oklahoma: Learning From Past Research Misconduct and Building Future Trusting Partnerships
    Chadwick, Jennifer Q.
    Copeland, Kenneth C.
    Branam, Dannielle E.
    Erb-Alvarez, Julie A.
    Khan, Sohail I.
    Peercy, Michael T.
    Rogers, Mark E.
    Saunkeah, Bobby R.
    Tryggestad, Jeanie B.
    Wharton, David F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 188 (07) : 1206 - 1212
  • [39] Equitable community-based participatory research engagement with communities of color drives All of Us Wisconsin genomic research priorities
    Thareja, Suma K.
    Yang, Xin
    Upama, Paramita Basak
    Abdullah, Aziz
    Torres, Shary Perez
    Cocroft, Linda Jackson
    Bubolz, Michael
    McGaughey, Kari
    Lou, Xuelin
    Kamaraju, Sailaja
    Ahamed, Sheikh Iqbal
    Madiraju, Praveen
    Kwitek, Anne E.
    Whittle, Jeffrey
    Franco, Zeno
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (12) : 2940 - 2951
  • [40] Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis
    Bogaert, Brenda
    Crevier, Marie-Josee
    Roth, Cindy
    Jox, Ralf J.
    Barazzetti, Gaia
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2024, 15 (05) : 529 - 538