On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review

被引:153
作者
Kruyen, Peter M. [1 ]
Emons, Wilco H. M. [2 ]
Sijtsma, Klaas [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, POB 9102, NL-6500 HC Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Tilburg Univ, Dept Methodol & Stat, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
literature review; psychological tests; reliability of short tests; test shortening; validity of short tests;
D O I
10.1080/15305058.2012.703734
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of the test scores in psychological research and individual decision making. In this study, we reviewed the psychological literature for recent trends in the use of short tests and examined in depth how and to what extent test constructors and test users addressed the impact on reliability and validity, other potential consequences of using short tests. The sample consisted of shortened tests found in six peer-reviewed psychological journals in the period 2005-2010. Based on our review, we provided recommendations for psychologists considering test shortening.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 248
页数:26
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   CONSTRUCTION OF CIRCUMPLEX SCALES FOR THE INVENTORY OF INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS [J].
ALDEN, LE ;
WIGGINS, JS ;
PINCUS, AL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1990, 55 (3-4) :521-536
[2]  
Allen M. J., 1979, INTRO MEASUREMENT TH
[3]  
American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education, 1999, STAND ED PSYCH TEST
[4]  
Anastasi A., 1997, PSYCHOL TESTING
[5]   SCREENING DEPRESSED PATIENTS IN FAMILY PRACTICE - RAPID TECHNIQUE [J].
BECK, AT ;
BECK, RW .
POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1972, 52 (06) :81-&
[6]   INEQUALITIES AMONG LOWER BOUNDS TO RELIABILITY - WITH APPLICATIONS TO TEST-CONSTRUCTION AND FACTOR-ANALYSIS [J].
BENTLER, PM ;
WOODWARD, JA .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1980, 45 (02) :249-267
[7]   The concept of validity [J].
Borsboom, D ;
Mellenbergh, GJ ;
van Heerden, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2004, 111 (04) :1061-1071
[8]  
Burisch M, 1997, EUR J PERSONALITY, V11, P303, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199711)11:4<303::AID-PER292>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-#
[10]  
Butcher JN, 1990, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V2, P12, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.2.1.12, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.2.1.12]