机构:
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Law, Int Law, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ctr Law Globalizat & Dev, Sch Law, Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Law, Int Law, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Morosini, Fabio
[1
,2
]
Vaz Ferreira, Luciano
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Amer Univ, Ctr Latin Amer & Latino Studies, Washington, DC 20016 USAUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Law, Int Law, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Vaz Ferreira, Luciano
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Law, Int Law, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Ctr Law Globalizat & Dev, Sch Law, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Amer Univ, Ctr Latin Amer & Latino Studies, Washington, DC 20016 USA
This note explains the new legal initiatives in the regulation of private corporate bribery in Brazil. Corruption is an endemic problem in many States, including ones with an emerging economy such as Brazil. The development and implementation of anticorruption policies necessarily goes through Klitgaard's " Principal-Agent-Client" model. According to this theory, it is important to create a system of punishment and incentive that focuses also on the " client," the private sector, a subject often forgotten in the drafting of anticorruption laws. This note argues that previous Brazilian corruption laws did not foresee a consistent legal framework capable of preventing and punishing companies' use of bribery. In this scenario, one can observe that Brazil began a process of institutional change over the course of recent years, which consisted of developing new anti-corruption mechanisms. The creation of The Office of Comptroller General (Controladoria Geral da Uniao), a federal government organ specialized in corruption control, is a landmark. The implementation of Law No. 12.846, which will enter into force in 2014, shows great promise. The new law predicts harsher punishments to companies involved in bribery. One interesting aspect is the creation of incentive mechanisms directed at cooperation with government inspection, leniency agreements and a provision to decrease punishment when compliance programs are implemented. Although in order for it to be put into practice, the latter demands a more precise definition. The authors are optimistic about this new initiative and await further developments.
机构:
Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaUniv Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
Fan, Jiasi
Tao, Zhexiong
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R ChinaUniv Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
Tao, Zhexiong
Oehmichen, Jana
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Chair Org Human Resources & Management, Jakob Welder Weg 9, D-55099 Mainz, Germany
Univ Groningen, Leadership & Governance, Groningen, NetherlandsUniv Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
Oehmichen, Jana
van Ees, Hans
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Groningen, Fac Econ & Business, Nettelbosje 2, NL-9747 AE Groningen, NetherlandsUniv Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, 10 Huixin Dongjie, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
机构:
Cornell Univ, Cornell Law Sch, New York, NY 14850 USA
Alexandria Univ, Fac Law, Alexandria 21526, EgyptCornell Univ, Cornell Law Sch, New York, NY 14850 USA