The effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia

被引:102
作者
Cheng, Ming Yu [1 ]
Chan, Wai Sei [2 ]
Mahmood, Amir [3 ]
机构
[1] Multimedia Univ, Res Management Ctr, Cyberjaya, Malaysia
[2] KBU Int Coll, Sch Business Hospitality & Tourism Management, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Fac Business & Law, Newcastle Grad Sch Business, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
来源
EDUCATION AND TRAINING | 2009年 / 51卷 / 07期
关键词
Entrepreneurialism; Education; Skills; Malaysia;
D O I
10.1108/00400910910992754
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to trace the development of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia; and to evaluate its effectiveness and limitations. Design/methodology/approach - Primary data are collected to reveal students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the entrepreneurship teaching and their knowledge about entrepreneurship. Findings - The results show that entrepreneurship education in Malaysia is not matching students' skill expectations with skill acquisition. The findings also indicate that the level of understanding on "what is entrepreneurship" is still low among the respondents selected in this paper. Research limitations/implications - The paper only concerns students' perceptions towards the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in their respective institutions. Results from this paper are limited in terms of their ability to demonstrate "actual" outcomes of entrepreneurship education. Practical implications - The paper provides an important exploratory analysis of the state of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia to enable further research to be taken in the area of entrepreneurship education. The findings provide valuable insight on effective teaching methodologies in the area of entrepreneurship education. Originality/value - The paper expands the framework of Morris et al., Drucker, and Gorman et al. to provide a basis to improve the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education in Malaysia.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 566
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ED TRAINING
[2]  
Clarke T. E., 1990, REV STATUS AVAILABIL
[3]  
Drucker P. F., 1985, HUM RESOUR MANAGE-US
[4]  
Gibb A., 1999, J GEN MANAG, V24, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1177/030630709902400401, DOI 10.1177/030630709902400401]
[5]  
Gorman G., 1997, INT SMALL BUS J, V15, P56, DOI DOI 10.1177/0266242697153004
[6]  
Hamilton R. T., 1994, J ECON STUD, V21, P3, DOI DOI 10.1108/01443589410071391
[7]  
Hytti U., 2004, Education + Training, V46, P11, DOI 10.1108/00400910410518188
[8]  
Ibrahim A.B., 2002, ED TRAIN, V44, P421, DOI [10.1108/00400910210449268, DOI 10.1108/00400910210449268]
[9]  
Institute of Strategic and International Studies, 2002, KNOWL BAS EC MAST PL
[10]   The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education 1876-1999 [J].
Katz, JA .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2003, 18 (02) :283-300