COMPARISON OF LUMBAR RANGE OF MOTION USING 3 MEASUREMENT DEVICES IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN

被引:15
作者
SHIRLEY, FR [1 ]
OCONNOR, P [1 ]
ROBINSON, ME [1 ]
MACMILLAN, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,SHANDS HOSP SPINAL TREATMENT & REHABIL PHYS THERAPY,GAINESVILLE,FL
关键词
Liquid inclinometer; Lumbar spine; Motion analysis; Range of motion sagittal plane; Tensiometric testing device;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199404000-00009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A correlational design was used to compare the lumbar spine's total sagittal range of motion (ROM) within a chronic low back pain patient population (n = 42) using three different measurement systems. Objectives. To compare, within a back pain patient population, the relationship of ROM measurements obtained from a motion analysis system (SPINETRAK), a lumbar extension rehabilitation device (MedX), and liquid inclinometers. Methods. Total lumbar sagittal ROM was determined with each device in each subject as part of patients' standard clinical evaluation. Results. Results indicated that the motion analysis system is significantly correlated with the liquid inclinometers and mildly correlated with the MedX. Inclinometer and MedX ROM measurements are also significantly correlated. To assess individual differences, dependent t tests were performed. Results indicated that the SPINETRAK yielded significantly lower ROM than the inclinometer or the MedX. The MedX and inclinometer measures did not significantly differ. Conclusions. This report shows that, depending on the device and procedures used, the lumbar sagittal ROM within a chronic low back pain population vary significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anderson J., Sweetman B.J., A combined flexi-rule/hydrogoniometer for measurement of lumbar spine and its sagittal movement, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, 14, pp. 173-179, (1975)
[2]  
(1965)
[3]  
(1989)
[4]  
Boone D.C., Azen S.P., Lin C.M., Spence C., Baron C., Lee L., Reliability of goniometric measurements, Phys Ther, 58, pp. 1355-1360, (1978)
[5]  
Brown R.H., Burstein A.H., Nash C.L., Schock C.C., Spinal analysis using a three-dimensional radiographic technique, J Biomech, 9, pp. 355-365, (1976)
[6]  
Burdett R.G., Brown K.E., Fall M.P., Reliability and validity of four instruments for measuring lumbar spine and pelvic positions, Phys Ther, 66, pp. 677-684, (1986)
[7]  
Derosa C.P., Porterfield J.A., A physical therapy model for the treatment of low back pain, Phys Ther, 72, pp. 261-272, (1992)
[8]  
Fitzgerald G.K., Wynven K., Rheault W., Rothchild B., Objective assessment with establishment of normal values for lumbar spinal range of motion, Phys Ther, 63, pp. 1776-1781, (1983)
[9]  
Gauvin M.G., Riddle D.L., Rothstein J.M., Reliability of clinical measurements of forward bending using the modified fingertip-to-floor method, Phys Ther, 70, pp. 443-447, (1990)
[10]  
Gracovetsky S., Kary M., Levy S., Ben-Said R., Pitchen I., Helie J., Analysis of spinal and muscular activity during flexion/extension and free lifts, Spine, 15, pp. 1333-1339, (1990)