PLASTICITY OF FISH BODY SHAPE - THE EFFECTS OF DIET, DEVELOPMENT, FAMILY AND AGE IN 2 SPECIES OF GEOPHAGUS (PISCES, CICHLIDAE)

被引:240
作者
WIMBERGER, PH [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV,ECOL & SYSTEMAT SECT,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; CICHLIDS; GEOPHAGUS; TROPHIC POLYMORPHISM; VARIATION; BODY SHAPE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.1992.tb00640.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fish body shape is affected by the genetic makeup of an individual as well as environmental influences, such as diet, development, growth rate and nutrition. Fishes in the family Cichlidae exhibit tremendous morphological diversity in body shape and morphology related to feeding. Certain aspects of cichlid feeding morphology have been shown to be plastic in response to different diets but plasticity in body shape has not been examined previously. Plasticity affects ecological interactions, the direction and rate of evolution, and has ramifications for characters used in systematic studies. I examined the effect of different diets: chironomid larvae (bloodworms) and brine shrimp nauplii, on body shape in two species of the Neotropical cichlid genus Geophagus which differ in the size at which young begin feeding on external food sources. The fry of G. brasiliensis, a substrate spawner, begin to feed on external food sources earlier than the fry of G. steindachneri, a mouthbrooder. I hypothesized that the difference in size at first feeding could lead to a difference in the amount of plasticity inducible in the two species. The magnitudes of changes were mostly similar, although G. brasiliensis responded to the different diets with slightly greater changes in some of the head measurements. The pattern of changes in the two species were also similar, with fish fed ferine shrimp nauplii developing longer and shallower heads and shallower bodies and tails than fish fed chironomid larvae. I also examined the consequences of considering family and age as additional factors besides diet in G. steindachneri. Considering family or age as additional factors in the analyses did not change the conclusion that different diets induce differences, albeit small ones, in body shape. I argue that morphological plasticity is dependent on behavioural flexibility and that it may enhance evolutionary morphological diversification. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 218
页数:22
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, EXPLANATION ORGANIC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1949, FACTORS OF EVOLUTION
[3]  
Baldwin JM., 1902, DEV EVOLUTION
[4]   CAUSES AND SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN FISHES [J].
BARLOW, GW .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1961, 10 (03) :105-117
[5]  
BEHNKE RJ, 1980, CHARRS SALMOID FISHE, P841
[6]  
Bookstein FL, 1985, SPECIAL PUBLICATION
[7]  
BRADSHAW A. D., 1965, ADVANCE GENET, V13, P115, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60048-6
[8]   GROWTH-INVARIANT DISCRIMINANT FUNCTIONS AND GENERALIZED DISTANCES [J].
BURNABY, TP .
BIOMETRICS, 1966, 22 (01) :96-&
[9]  
CICHOKI FP, 1976, THESIS U MICHIGAN AN
[10]  
COLLINS JP, 1983, AM ZOOL, V23, P77