Growth and Physiological Responses of Phaseolus Species to Salinity Stress

被引:24
|
作者
Bayuelo-Jimenez, J. S. [1 ]
Jasso-Plata, N. [1 ]
Ochoa, I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michoacana, Inst Invest Agr & Forestales, Km 9-5 Carr Morelia Zinapecuaro, Tarimbaro 58880, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Unipalma SA, Dept Mejoramiento Semillas, Bogota, Colombia
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2012/527673
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This paper reports the changes on growth, photosynthesis, water relations, soluble carbohydrate, and ion accumulation, for two salt-tolerant and two salt-sensitive Phaseolus species grown under increasing salinity (0, 60 and 90mM NaCl). After 20 days exposure to salt, biomass was reduced in all species to a similar extent (about 56%), with the effect of salinity on relative growth rate (RGR) confined largely to the first week. RGR of salt-tolerant species was reduced by salinity due to leaf area ratio (LAR) reduction rather than a decline in photosynthetic capacity, whereas unit leaf rate and LAR were the key factors in determining RGR on salt-sensitive species. Photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance decreased gradually with salinity, showing significant reductions only in salt-sensitive species at the highest salt level. There was little difference between species in the effect of salinity on water relations, as indicated by their positive turgor. Osmotic adjustment occurred in all species and depended on higher K+, Na+, and Cl- accumulation. Despite some changes in soluble carbohydrate accumulation induced by salt stress, no consistent contributions in osmotic adjustment could be found in this study. Therefore, we suggest that tolerance to salt stress is largely unrelated to carbohydrate accumulation in Phaseolus species.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Growth and physiological responses of Phaseolus spp. under salinity
    Bahena Betancourt, Leobardo
    Macias Rodriguez, Lourdes
    Lopez Gomez, Rodolfo
    Bayuelo Jimenez, Jeannette S.
    REVISTA FITOTECNIA MEXICANA, 2008, 31 (03) : 213 - 223
  • [2] Growth and Physiological Responses of Bermudagrass to Salinity Stress
    Xu, Ran
    Fujiyama, Hideyasu
    HORTSCIENCE, 2013, 48 (09) : S218 - S219
  • [3] Differential Responses of Jatropha Species on Growth and Physiological Parameters to Salinity Stress at Seedling Plant Stage
    Hishida, Masako
    Ascencio-Valle, Felipe
    Fujiyama, Hideyasu
    Orduno-Cruz, Andres
    Endo, Tsuneyoshi
    Angel Larrinaga-Mayoral, Juan
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2013, 44 (19) : 2820 - 2829
  • [4] Differential physiological and biochemical responses of three Echinacea species to salinity stress
    Sabra, Ali
    Daayf, Fouad
    Renault, Sylvie
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2012, 135 : 23 - 31
  • [5] Physiological and Growth Responses of Six Turfgrass Species Relative to Salinity Tolerance
    Uddin, Md. Kamal
    Juraimi, Abdul Shukor
    Ismail, Mohd. Razi
    Hossain, Md. Alamgir
    Othman, Radziah
    Rahim, Anuar Abdul
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [6] Growth and Physiological Responses of 'Persian' Lime and 'Mayer' Lemon to Salinity Stress
    Alireza, S.
    Awang, Y. B.
    Juraimi, A. S.
    Othman, R.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNDERUTILIZED PLANT SPECIES: CROPS FOR THE FUTURE - BEYOND FOOD SECURITY, 2013, 979 : 755 - 761
  • [7] PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES TO NACl SALINITY STRESS IN THREE ROEGNERIA (POACEAE) SPECIES
    Xie, Jihong
    Dai, Yating
    Mu, Huaibin
    De, Ying
    Chen, Hao
    Wu, Zinian
    Yu, Linqing
    Ren, Weibo
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 48 (06) : 2215 - 2222
  • [8] Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress
    Negrao, S.
    Schmockel, S. M.
    Tester, M.
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2017, 119 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [9] Growth, Morphological, and Biochemical Responses of Four Native Species to Salinity Stress
    Paudel, Asmita
    Sun, Youping
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (06) : 651 - 659
  • [10] Salinity tolerance in Phaseolus species during early vegetative growth
    Bayuelo-Jiménez, JS
    Debouck, DG
    Lynch, JP
    CROP SCIENCE, 2002, 42 (06) : 2184 - 2192