Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?

被引：26

作者：

Akan, Burak ^{[1
,2
]}

Karaguven, Dogac ^{[1
]}

Guclu, Berk ^{[1
]}

Yildirim, Tugrul ^{[1
]}

Kaya, Alper ^{[1
]}

Armangil, Mehmet ^{[3
]}

Cetin, Ilker ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ufuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Ankara, Turkey

[2] Dikmen C Parkpinar Evleri, TR-06420 Ankara, Turkey

[3] Ankara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Ankara, Turkey

来源：

ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS | 2013年 / 2013卷

关键词：

D O I：

10.1155/2013/245915

中图分类号：

R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学（修复外科学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose. The use of uncemented unicompartmental knee prostheses has recently increased. However, few studies on the outcomes of uncemented unicompartmental knee prostheses have been performed. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of cemented and uncemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. This retrospective observational study evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of 263 medial Oxford unicompartmental prostheses (141 cemented, 122 uncemented) implanted in 235 patients. The mean follow-up was 42 months in the cemented group and 30 months in the uncemented group. Results. At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences in the clinical results or survival rates between the two groups. However, the operation time in the uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty group was shorter than that in the cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty group. In addition, the cost of uncemented arthroplasty was greater. Conclusion. Despite the successful midterm results in the uncemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty group, a longer follow-up period is required to determine the best fixation mode.

引用

页数：6

共 27 条

[1] Medial femoral condyle fracture after cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: A rare complication [J].

Akan, Burak ;

Yildirim, Tugrul ;

Karaguven, Dogac .

KNEE, 2013, 20 (04) :295-297

[2]

BARRETT WP, 1987, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V69A, P1328

[3] Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation -: A randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years [J].

Carlsson, Å ;

Björkman, A ;

Besjakov, J ;

Önsten, I .

ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (03) :362-369

[4] Periprosthetic tibial fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a function of extended sagittal saw cuts: An experimental study [J].

Clarius, M. ;

Haas, D. ;

Aldinger, P. R. ;

Jaeger, S. ;

Jakubowitz, E. ;

Seeger, J. B. .

KNEE, 2010, 17 (01) :57-60

[5] Comparison of Medium-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcome between Cemented and Cementless Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty [J].

Daniilidis, K. ;

Skwara, A. ;

Skuginna, A. ;

Fischer, F. ;

Tibesku, C. O. .

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2009, 147 (02) :188-193

[6] Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement [J].

Furnes, O. ;

Espehaug, B. ;

Lie, S. A. ;

Vollset, S. E. ;

Engesaeter, L. B. ;

Havelin, L. I. .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (03) :519-525

[7] A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure RE-INTERPRETATION OF KNEE JOINT REGISTRY DATA [J].

Goodfellow, J. W. ;

O'Connor, J. J. ;

Murray, D. W. .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (12) :1628-1631

[8]

Goodfellow John, 2002, J Knee Surg, V15, P240

[9] THE OXFORD KNEE FOR UNICOMPARTMENTAL OSTEO-ARTHRITIS - THE 1ST 103 CASES [J].

GOODFELLOW, JW ;

KERSHAW, CJ ;

BENSON, MKD ;

OCONNOR, JJ .

JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1988, 70 (05) :692-701

[10]

Goodfellow JW, 2006, UNICOMPARTMENTAL ART

← 1 2 3 →