NO-NET-ROTATION MODEL OF CURRENT PLATE VELOCITIES INCORPORATING PLATE MOTION MODEL NUVEL-1

被引:315
作者
ARGUS, DF [1 ]
GORDON, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] NORTHWESTERN UNIV,DEPT GEOL SCI,EVANSTON,IL 60208
关键词
D O I
10.1029/91GL01532
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We present NNR-NUVEL1, a model of plate velocities relative to the unique reference frame defined by requiring no-net-rotation of the lithosphere while constraining relative plate velocities to equal those in global plate motion model NUVEL-1 [DeMets et al., 1990]. Differences between NNR-NUVEL1 and no-net-rotation plate motion model AM0-2 [Minster and Jordan, 1978] are as large as 15 mm/yr. In NNR-NUVEL1, the Pacific plate rotates in a right-handed sense relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame at 0.67-degrees/m.y. about 63-degrees-S, 107-degrees-E. This rotation nearly parallels, but is 32% slower than, the Pacific-hotspot Euler vector of HS2-NUVEL1, which is a global model of plate-hotspot velocities constrained to consistency with NUVEL-1 [Gripp and Gordon, 1990]. At Hawaii the Pacific plate moves relative to the no-net-rotation reference frame at 70 mm/yr, which is 25 mm/yr slower than the Pacific plate moves relative to the hotspots. Differences between NNR-NUVEL1 and HS2-NUVEL1 are described completely by a right-handed rotation of 0.33-degrees/m.y. about 49-degrees-S, 65-degrees-E. The 99% confidence ellipsoids for plate-hotspot motion in model HS2-NUVEL1 exclude the corresponding Euler vectors from model NNR-NUVEL1. Thus the no-net-rotation reference frame differs significantly from the hotspot reference frame. If the difference between reference frames is caused by motion of the hotspots relative to a mean mantle reference frame, then hotspots beneath the Pacific plate move with coherent motion towards the east-southeast. Alternatively, the difference between reference frames may show that the uniform drag, no-net-torque reference frame, which is kinematically equivalent to the no-net-rotation reference frame, is based on a dynamically incorrect premise. Possible exceptions to the assumption of uniform drag include a net torque on the lithosphere due to attached subducting slabs and greater resistance to plate motion beneath continents than beneath oceans.
引用
收藏
页码:2039 / 2042
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   ASTHENOSPHERIC COUNTERFLOW - KINEMATIC MODEL [J].
CHASE, CG .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 56 (01) :1-18
[2]   N-PLATE PROBLEM OF PLATE TECTONICS [J].
CHASE, CG .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1972, 29 (02) :117-&
[3]   PLATE KINEMATICS - AMERICAS, EAST-AFRICA, AND REST OF WORLD [J].
CHASE, CG .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 1978, 37 (03) :355-368
[4]   CURRENT PLATE MOTIONS [J].
DEMETS, C ;
GORDON, RG ;
ARGUS, DF ;
STEIN, S .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1990, 101 (02) :425-478
[5]  
ENGEBRETSON DC, 1985, 206 GEOL SOC AM SPEC
[6]   CENOZOIC GLOBAL PLATE MOTIONS [J].
GORDON, RG ;
JURDY, DM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1986, 91 (B12) :2389-2406
[7]   CURRENT PLATE VELOCITIES RELATIVE TO THE HOTSPOTS INCORPORATING THE NUVEL-1 GLOBAL PLATE MOTION MODEL [J].
GRIPP, AE ;
GORDON, RG .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1990, 17 (08) :1109-1112
[8]   MANTLE FLOW AND PLATE MOTIONS [J].
HARPER, JF .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1986, 87 (01) :155-171
[9]  
MA C, 1989, NASA1000723 TECHN ME
[10]  
MELBOURNE WG, 1983, VSNO167 CIRC