Challenges and approaches in modern biometry and IOL calculation

被引:48
作者
Haigis, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Ophthalmol, 11 Josef Schneider Str, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Optical biometry; Corneal power; Keratometer index; IOL calculation; Problem eyes; Post-refractive surgery IOL; Cataract surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.11.007
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
The introduction of new intraocular lenses (IOLs), industry marketing to the public and patient expectations has warranted increased accuracy of IOL power calculations. Toric IOLs, multifocal IOLs, aspheric IOLs, phakic lenses, accommodative lenses, cases of refractive lens exchange and eyes that have undergone previous refractive surgery all require improved clinical measurements and IOL prediction formulas. Hence, measurement techniques and IOL calculation formulas are essential factors that affect the refractive outcome. Measurement with ultrasound has been the historic standard for measurement of ocular parameters for IOL calculation. However the introduction of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry (PCI) has steadily established itself as the new standard. Additionally, modern optical instruments such as Scheimpflug cameras and optical coherence tomographers are being used to determine corneal power that was normally the purview of manual keratometry and topography. A number of methods are available to determine the IOL power including the empirical, analytical, numerical or combined methods. Ray tracing techniques or paraxial approximation by matrix methods or classical analytical 'IOL formulas' are actively used in for the prediction of IOL power. There is no universal formula for all cases - phakic and pseudophakic cases require different approaches, as do short eyes, long eyes, astigmatic eyes or post-refractive surgery eyes. Invariably, IOLs are characterized by different methods and lens constants, which require individual optimization. This review describes the current methods for biometry and IOL calculation.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 12
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula
    Borasio, Edmondo
    Stevens, Julian
    Smith, Guy T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (12) : 2004 - 2014
  • [2] A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients
    Buckhurst, P. J.
    Wolffsohn, J. S.
    Shah, S.
    Naroo, S. A.
    Davies, L. N.
    Berrow, E. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (07) : 949 - 953
  • [3] Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery
    Gale, R. P.
    Saldana, M.
    Johnston, R. L.
    Zuberbuhler, B.
    McKibbin, M.
    [J]. EYE, 2009, 23 (01) : 149 - 152
  • [4] Haigis W, 1991, 5 K DTSCH GES INTR I, P198
  • [5] Haigis W, 2010, 23 K DEUTSCHSPRACHIG, P197
  • [6] HAIGIS W, 2007, MASTERING INTRAOCULA, P92
  • [7] Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula
    Haigis, Wolfgang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (10) : 1658 - 1663
  • [8] Hill W, 2011, IOL POWER CALCULATIO
  • [9] Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Shammas, H. John
    Savini, Giacomo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (04) : 644 - 648
  • [10] Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements
    Holzer, M. P.
    Mamusa, M.
    Auffarth, G. U.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (06) : 807 - 810