On the use of play theory in analyses of online public commentary

被引:5
作者
Caldwell, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ft Hare, Commun, Alice, South Africa
来源
COMMUNICATIO-SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL FOR COMMUNICATION THEORY AND RESEARCH | 2013年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
cultural citizenship; Huizinga; Internet; news forums; play theory; public opinion;
D O I
10.1080/02500167.2013.864449
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The concept of play mediates between deliberation as a mode of reason and resistance as a mode of culture, thus opening a way to think about hostile comment (e.g., 'flaming') on online news forums as normal patterns of behaviour, instead of a departure from the received view of how citizens ought to consider matters of public interest. The play concept corresponds with current thinking around the notion of cultural citizenship. To illustrate the relevance of play theory in the analysis of online political discourse, this article uses an example from recent posts concerning the Protection of Information Bill (POIB) in the online site of the South African Mail & Guardian newspaper. The cogency of play theory to the concept of citizenship is argued through a discussion of how citizenship has been understood from the 1930s to the late 1980s and early 1990s, when the improved capacities of information and communications technologies (ICTs) made online deliberation a normal site for citizenship to be exercised.
引用
收藏
页码:501 / 517
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Ackerman Bruce, 2003, DEBATING DELIBERATIV, P7
[2]   False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research [J].
Althaus, Scott L. .
CRITICAL REVIEW, 2006, 18 (1-3) :75-104
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CONVERGENCE INT J RE
[4]  
[Anonymous], DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP
[5]  
Appadurai Arjun, 1990, PUBLIC CULTURE, V7, P295, DOI DOI 10.1177/026327690007002017
[6]  
Barlow A., 2008, BLOGGING AM NEW PUBL
[7]  
Bennett L., 2006, SOC EDUC, V70, P144
[8]  
Bennett W. Lance, 2005, TRANSNATIONAL PROTES, P203
[9]  
Berger A. A., 1995, ESSENTIALS MASS COMM
[10]  
CHOVANEC J, 2010, CASES ONLINE DISCUSS, P234, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-61520-863-0.CH012