COMPARATIVE FARROWING TO WEANING PERFORMANCE IN MEISHAN AND LARGE WHITE-PIGS AND THEIR CROSSES

被引:33
作者
LEE, GJ
HALEY, CS
机构
[1] Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin
来源
ANIMAL SCIENCE | 1995年 / 60卷
关键词
CROSSBREEDING; LITTER WEIGHT; MEISHAN; PIGS; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.1017/S1357729800008432
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Growth and survival from birth to weaning were monitored during three generations of crossbreeding between British Large White (LW) and Chinese Meishan (MS) pigs. The design allowed comparisons between sow genotypes ranging from zero to all MS genes, which were mated to LW or MS boars, to produce progeny with proportions of 0.0 to 0.5 or 0.5 to 1.0 MS genes, respectively. Crossbreeding parameters of both maternal and direct piglet performance were estimated for the first two parities using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) methods for litter traits (litter weight at birth, litter mean and within litter standard deviation of piglet weight at birth, proportion surviving to weaning, litter size and weight at weaning and litter mean piglet weight at weaning) and for traits of the piglet (birth weight, probability of survival and weaning weight). For litter traits, the estimated contribution of the additive maternal effect to the breed differences (MS-LW) was significant for litter mean piglet birth weight (-0.46 (s.e. 0.04) kg), survival to weaning (-0.15 (s.e. 0.02)), litter size at weaning (1.6 (s.e. 0.16) piglets), litter weaning weight (-11.2 (s.e. 3.8) kg) and litter mean piglet weaning weight (-2.54 (s.e. 0.24) kg). Adding litter size and litter mean piglet birth weight to the model removed the additive maternal contribution to the breed differences in survival, and litter size and reduced that for litter mean piglet weaning weight. The contribution of the direct additive effect to the breed differences (MS-LW) was significant for the within litter standard deviation in birth weight (-0.018 (s.e. 0.006)), survival to weaning (0.12 (s.e. 0.02)) and litter size (1.12 (s.e. 0.64)) and weight (11.6 (s.e. 4.0) kg) at weaning, but not for piglet weight at birth or weaning. Fitting litter size and litter mean birth weight had comparatively litter impact on the direct additive effects. There were significant maternal heterosis effects for litter weight at birth and litter size and weight at weaning, the estimated deviation of the F-1 from the mid point of the two purebreds 3.22 (s.e. 0.55) kg, 2.20 (s.e. 0.47) piglets, and 20.1 (s.e. 3.3) kg respectively, but none for survival or piglet weights. There were directed heterosis effects for litter weight and litter mean piglet weights, the estimated deviation of the F-1 from the mid point of the two purebreds being 1.16 (s.e. 0.41) kg and 0.14 (s.e. 0.02) kg, for survival to weaning (0.04 (s.e. 0.02)) and for litter weight (11.2 (s.e. 2.5) kg) and litter mean piglet weight (0.96 (s.e. 0.17) kg) at weaning. Fitting litter size and litter mean piglet birth weight removed or reduced both maternal and direct heterosis effects. Individual piglet analyses gave similar results to analyses of the equivalent sow trait. It was concluded that in litters born to MS cows, the lower piglet survival and lower weaning weights were related to the larger litter sizes and lower piglet birth weights. For their birth weight, however, MS piglets have a greater ability to survive and thrive. The large direct and maternal heterosis effects observed for litter and mean piglet weight at weaning were partly associated with the heavier birth weight of the crossbred piglet.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 280
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   ESTIMATION OF CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS BETWEEN LARGE WHITE AND MEISHAN PORCINE BREEDS .2. GROWTH BEFORE WEANING AND GROWTH OF FEMALES DURING THE GROWING AND REPRODUCTIVE PERIODS [J].
BIDANEL, JP ;
CARITEZ, JC ;
LEGAULT, C .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1990, 22 (04) :431-445
[2]   ESTIMATION OF CROSSBREEDING PARAMETERS BETWEEN LARGE WHITE AND MEISHAN PORCINE BREEDS .1. REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE [J].
BIDANEL, JP ;
CARITEZ, JC ;
LEGAULT, C .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 1989, 21 (04) :507-526
[3]  
Dickerson GE., 1969, ANIM BREED ABSTR, V37, P191
[4]  
English P. R., 1982, Control of pig reproduction, P479
[5]  
English P. R., 1975, Veterinary Annual, V15, P95
[6]   EVALUATION OF PIGLET MORTALITY IN 28 2-BREED CROSSES AMONG 8 BREEDS OF PIG [J].
FAHMY, MH ;
HOLTMANN, WB ;
MACINTYRE, TM ;
MOXLEY, JE .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 1978, 26 (JUN) :277-285
[7]  
GALVIN JM, 1993, J REPROD FERTIL, V98, P377, DOI 10.1530/jrf.0.0980377
[8]  
HALEY CS, 1995, ANIMAL SCI, V60
[9]  
HALEY CS, 1990, CHINESE PIG S, P83
[10]  
HALEY CS, 1990, 4TH P WORLD C GEN AP, V15, P458