Excess volatility and closed-end fund discounts

被引:0
|
作者
Bleaney, Michael [1 ]
Smith, R. Todd [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Econ, Nottingham, England
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Econ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
Closed-end fund; Discounts; Excess volatility; Fund management;
D O I
10.1108/14757701311327713
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the conditions under which discount risk leads to closed-end funds trading at a discount. Design/methodology/approach - A model of investor portfolio choice is developed in which investors face proportional fees for holding managed funds but fixed transaction fees for purchasing other risky assets. The conditions under which investors will hold shares in closed-end funds are derived. Findings - It is shown that, with fixed transaction costs in the market for risky assets, investors with wealth below a certain threshold will hold pooled index funds that charge a proportional fee, rather than the market portfolio chosen by wealthier investors. If a portfolio of closed-end index funds yields greater volatility of returns to investors than open-end index funds (i.e. displays "excess volatility"), and charges the same fees, the closed-end funds need to trade at a discount in equilibrium to attract buyers. The same applies to actively managed funds if higher fees fully reflect extra expected returns from the managers' skill. Practical implications - A primary determinant of closed-end fund discounts is discount volatility and co-movement across funds. Originality/value - Until now it has been argued that discount risk needs to be systematic (correlated with market returns) to be priced. The evidence that discount risk is systematic is weak. There is strong empirical evidence of excess volatility and co-movement of discounts across closed-end funds, which in our model are a sufficient condition for funds to trade at a discount, under plausible assumptions. This model thus provides a stronger argument that discount risk explains why discounts exist.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 179
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effects of takeover defenses: Evidence from closed-end funds
    Souther, Matthew E.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 119 (02) : 420 - 440
  • [32] Managed Distribution Policies in Closed-End Funds and Shareholder Activism
    Cherkes, Martin
    Sagi, Jacob S.
    Wang, Z. Jay
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 2014, 49 (5-6) : 1311 - 1337
  • [33] Managerial performance and the cross-sectional pricing of closed-end funds
    Chay, JB
    Trzcinka, CA
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 52 (03) : 379 - 408
  • [34] Activist arbitrage: A study of open-ending attempts of closed-end funds
    Bradley, Michael
    Brav, Alon
    Goldstein, Itay
    Jiang, Wei
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 95 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [35] Learning and excess volatility
    Bullard, J
    Duffy, J
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2001, 5 (02) : 272 - 302
  • [36] Noise-trading, costly arbitrage, and asset prices: Evidence from US closed-end funds
    Flynn, Sean Masaki
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2012, 15 (01) : 108 - 125
  • [37] Pay-performance sensitivity and risk-taking behaviors: Evidence from closed-end funds
    Yang, Tianna
    Hou, Wenxuan
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2016, 29 : 274 - 288
  • [38] Managerial Rents vs. Shareholder Value in Delegated Portfolio Management: The Case of Closed-End Funds
    Wu, Youchang
    Wermers, Russ
    Zechner, Josef
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2016, 29 (12) : 3428 - 3470
  • [39] Excess Volatility in Bitcoin: Extreme Value Volatility Estimation
    Kayal, Parthajit
    Balasubramanian, G.
    IIM KOZHIKODE SOCIETY & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 10 (02) : 222 - 231
  • [40] A spectral perspective on excess volatility
    Livan, Giacomo
    Alfarano, Simone
    Milakovic, Mishael
    Scalas, Enrico
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 22 (09) : 745 - 750