Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience

被引:20
作者
Zilina, Olga [1 ,2 ]
Teek, Rita [1 ,3 ]
Tammur, Pille [1 ]
Kuuse, Kati [1 ]
Yakoreva, Maria [1 ,4 ]
Vaidla, Eve [1 ]
Molter-Vaar, Triin [1 ]
Reimand, Tiia [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Kurg, Ants [2 ]
Ounap, Katrin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tartu Univ Hosp, Dept Genet, United Labs, Tartu, Estonia
[2] Univ Tartu, Inst Mol & Cell Biol, Dept Biotechnol, 23 Riia St, Tartu, Estonia
[3] Univ Tartu, Dept Pediat, Tartu, Estonia
[4] Univ Tartu, Inst Biomed & Translat Med, Dept Biomed, Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Chromosomal microarray analysis; copy-number variation; developmental delay; first-tier testing; intellectual disability; postnatal diagnosis; prenatal diagnosis;
D O I
10.1002/mgg3.57
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is now established as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for fast and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009-2012. Since 2011, CMA is on the official service list of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and is performed as the first-tier cytogenetic test for patients with DD/ID, MCA or ASD. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed, including postnatal (1072 [90%] patients and 59 [5%] family members) and prenatal referrals (60 [5%] fetuses). Abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1-3 per individual): 147 (42%) deletions, 106 (30%) duplications, 89 (25%) long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) events (> 5 Mb), and nine (3%) aneuploidies. Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic; for another 143 findings (41%), most of which were LCSH, the clinical significance remained unknown, while 61 (18%) reported findings can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign. Clinically relevant findings were detected in 126 (11%) patients. However, the proportion of variants of unknown clinical significance was quite high (41% of all findings). It seems that our ability to detect chromosomal abnormalities has far outpaced our ability to understand their role in disease. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 175
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Array CGH as a first line diagnostic test in place of karyotyping for postnatal referrals - results from four years' clinical application for over 8,700 patients [J].
Ahn, Joo Wook ;
Bint, Susan ;
Bergbaum, Anne ;
Mann, Kathy ;
Hall, Richard P. ;
Ogilvie, Caroline Mackie .
MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS, 2013, 6
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P1161, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33cad
[3]   Confirmation of chromosomal microarray as a firsttier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorders and dysmorphic features. [J].
Battaglia, Agatino ;
Doccini, Viola ;
Bernardini, Laura ;
Novelli, Antonio ;
Loddo, Sara ;
Capalbo, Anna ;
Filippi, Tiziana ;
Carey, John C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2013, 17 (06) :589-599
[4]   The Utility of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics [J].
Beaudet, Arthur L. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 84 (01) :121-132
[5]   Clinical utility of contemporary molecular cytogenetics [J].
Bejjani, Bassem A. ;
Shaffer, Lisa G. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2008, 9 :71-86
[6]   Hotspots of Large Rare Deletions in the Human Genome [J].
Bradley, W. Edward C. ;
Raelson, John V. ;
Dubois, Daniel Y. ;
Godin, Eric ;
Fournier, Helene ;
Prive, Charles ;
Allard, Rene ;
Pinchuk, Vadym ;
Lapalme, Micheline ;
Paulussen, Rene J. A. ;
Belouchi, Abdelmajid .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (02)
[7]   QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data [J].
Colella, Stefano ;
Yau, Christopher ;
Taylor, Jennifer M. ;
Mirza, Ghazala ;
Butler, Helen ;
Clouston, Penny ;
Bassett, Anne S. ;
Seller, Anneke ;
Holmes, Christopher C. ;
Ragoussis, Jiannis .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2007, 35 (06) :2013-2025
[8]   Mechanisms of mosaicism, chimerism and uniparental disomy identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis [J].
Conlin, Laura K. ;
Thiel, Brian D. ;
Bonnemann, Carsten G. ;
Medne, Livija ;
Ernst, Linda M. ;
Zackai, Elaine H. ;
Deardorff, Matthew A. ;
Krantz, Ian D. ;
Hakonarson, Hakon ;
Spinner, Nancy B. .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2010, 19 (07) :1263-1275
[9]   A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delay [J].
Cooper, Gregory M. ;
Coe, Bradley P. ;
Girirajan, Santhosh ;
Rosenfeld, Jill A. ;
Vu, Tiffany H. ;
Baker, Carl ;
Williams, Charles ;
Stalker, Heather ;
Hamid, Rizwan ;
Hannig, Vickie ;
Abdel-Hamid, Hoda ;
Bader, Patricia ;
McCracken, Elizabeth ;
Niyazov, Dmitriy ;
Leppig, Kathleen ;
Thiese, Heidi ;
Hummel, Marybeth ;
Alexander, Nora ;
Gorski, Jerome ;
Kussmann, Jennifer ;
Shashi, Vandana ;
Johnson, Krys ;
Rehder, Catherine ;
Ballif, Blake C. ;
Shaffer, Lisa G. ;
Eichler, Evan E. .
NATURE GENETICS, 2011, 43 (09) :838-U44
[10]   Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns [J].
Coughlin, Curtis R., III ;
Scharer, Gunter H. ;
Shaikh, Tamim H. .
GENOME MEDICINE, 2012, 4