COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS - A REVIEW

被引:25
|
作者
RUTIGLIANO, MJ
机构
[1] Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
关键词
ECONOMICS; METHODS;
D O I
10.1227/00006123-199509000-00011
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
MEDICAL TREATMENTS AND strategies are increasingly being subjected to evaluations of economic efficiency. Although the reasons for this are many, it is becoming ever more important for physicians to have an understanding of the uses and limitations of such evaluations. Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a technique that measures the cost of medical technology per unit of a defined health output, usually life years saved with an adjustment for quality of survival. CEA is a popular method of economic evaluation for policy makers, because it can provide direct comparisons among many medical technologies, resulting in a ranked order of procedures based on economic efficiency. The proper interpretation of a CEA requires an understanding of the component parts of the analysis, their theoretical bases, and their limitations. The components of a CEA include the determination of relevant costs, an appropriate analysis viewpoint, the use of discounting for both costs and benefits, and a sensitivity analysis of the assumptions and probabilities that drive the analysis. Marginal and incremental CEAs are techniques that help to address the cost effectiveness of different amounts of a particular treatment and the differential costs and benefits of competing strategies, respectively. A review is presented of the theoretical basis of CEA and its component parts. Emphasis is placed on generating an understanding of the method rather than providing a step-by-step protocol for the undertaking of such studies.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 443
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS - A REVIEW - COMMENT
    BLACK, PM
    NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 37 (03) : 443 - 444
  • [2] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Radiology: A Systematic Review
    Zhou, Alice
    Yousem, David M.
    Alvin, Matthew D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (11) : 1536 - 1546
  • [3] WILL COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS WORSEN THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CARE
    HIMMELSTEIN, DU
    WOOLHANDLER, S
    BOR, DH
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1987, 35 (03): : A744 - A744
  • [4] PRESSURE TO TREAT AND PRESSURE TO COST - A REVIEW OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    FLETCHER, A
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1991, 9 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [5] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF MEDICATION REVIEW INTERVENTIONS: A REVIEW OF LITERATURES
    Akazawa, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A515 - A515
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Stein, Sherman C.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    Burnett, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (04) : 474 - 474
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    GANIATS, TG
    PRIMARY CARE, 1995, 22 (02): : 307 - 318
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Yates, BT
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2002, 25 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    BALAKRISHNA, S
    JOURNAL OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 11 (05) : 701 - 703
  • [10] The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treat-to-target strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Wailoo, Allan
    Hock, Emma S.
    Stevenson, Matt
    Martyn-St James, Marrissa
    Rawdin, Andrew
    Simpson, Emma
    Wong, Ruth
    Dracup, Naila
    Scott, David L.
    Young, Adam
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 21 (71) : 1 - +