THE DISTANCE TO THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD - CONSTRAINTS FROM CEPHEIDS IN LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD STAR-CLUSTERS

被引:19
|
作者
BERTELLI, G
BRESSAN, A
CHIOSI, C
MATEO, M
WOOD, PR
机构
[1] OSSERV ASTRON PADOVA, I-35122 PADUA, ITALY
[2] UNIV PADUA, DEPT ASTRON, I-35122 PADUA, ITALY
[3] CARNEGIE OBSERV, PASADENA, CA 91101 USA
[4] MT STROMLO & SIDING SPRINGS OBSERV, WESTON, ACT 2611, AUSTRALIA
关键词
CEPHEIDS; GALAXIES; DISTANCES AND REDSHIFTS; MAGELLANIC CLOUDS; OPEN CLUSTERS AND ASSOCIATIONS; INDIVIDUAL; (NGC; 1866; 2031); STARS; OSCILLATIONS;
D O I
10.1086/172908
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We have used recent observational data for the Cepheids in the rich, young Large Magellanic Cloud clusters NGC 1866 and NGC 2031 to constrain the cluster distances with the mass-equivalency (ME) method. The basis of this approach is to fix the cluster distances by requiring the Cepheid evolutionary and pulsational masses to be equal. Using evolutionary models incorporating a mild amount of core and envelope over-shooting along with recent pulsational models, we derive distance moduli of 18.51+/-0.21 and 18.32+/-0.20 for NGC 1866 and NGC 2031, respectively. The quoted errors are dominated by the uncertainties in the heavy element abundances of the clusters (assumed to be 0.3 dex for both clusters), with a smaller contribution due to the apparently intrinsic spread in the masses of the Cepheids in each cluster. For the ME method, we find that DELTA(m - M)0/DELTAZ1 = 0.69, where Z1 = log (Z/0.016). This result implies that the cluster distances can be determined to better than +/-5% if the cluster abundances can be measured to better than about +/-0.15 dex. The distance moduli we derive for NGC 1866 and NGC 2031 are consistent with other recent values derived for the LMC, meaning that the models used in this analysis avoid the classical evolutionary/pulsational Cepheid mass discrepancy. The results of our analysis are based on models using the Los Alamos opacities; had we used models incorporating the new Livermore opacities instead, we estimate that the cluster distance moduli would be larger by at most 0.1 mag.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 172
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magellanic Cloud Cepheids: Abundances
    Luck, RE
    Moffett, TJ
    Barnes, TG
    Gieren, WP
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 115 (02) : 605 - 634
  • [22] The real population of star clusters in the bar of the Large Magellanic Cloud
    Piatti, Andres E.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2017, 606
  • [23] A δ Scuti distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud
    McNamara, D. Harold
    Clementini, Gisella
    Marconi, Marcella
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 133 (06) : 2752 - 2763
  • [24] The linearity of the wesenheit function for the Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids
    Ngeow, CC
    Kanbur, SM
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 360 (03) : 1033 - 1039
  • [25] Be star candidates in the Large Magellanic Cloud: the catalogue and comparison with the Small Magellanic Cloud sample
    Sabogal, BE
    Mennickent, RE
    Pietrzynski, G
    Gieren, W
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 361 (03) : 1055 - 1062
  • [27] The star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud as seen by star clusters and stars
    Maschberger, Thomas
    Kroupa, Pavel
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 411 (03) : 1495 - 1502
  • [28] Hubble Space Telescope observations of the oldest star clusters in the Large Magellanic Cloud
    Johnson, JA
    Bolte, M
    Stetson, PB
    Hesser, JE
    Somerville, RS
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 527 (01) : 199 - 218
  • [29] The star formation history of the Large Magellanic Cloud
    Smecker-Hane, TA
    Cole, AA
    Gallagher, JS
    Stetson, PB
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 566 (01) : 239 - 244
  • [30] Integrated UBV photometry of 624 star clusters and associations in the Large Magellanic Cloud
    Bica, E
    Claria, JJ
    Dottori, H
    Santos, JFC
    Piatti, AE
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1996, 102 (01) : 57 - 73