Covariance Structures in Conventional and Organic Cropping Systems

被引:1
|
作者
Jaradat, Abdullah A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, USDA ARS, 803 Iowa Ave, Morris, MN 56267 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Agron & Plant Genet, Morris, MN 56267 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2013/494026
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Guidelines are needed to develop proper statistical analyses procedures and select appropriate models of covariance structures in response to expected temporal variation in long-term experiments. Cumulative yield, its temporal variance, and coefficient of variation were used in estimating and describing covariance structures in conventional and organic cropping systems of a longterm field experiment in a randomized complete block design. An 8-year database on 16 treatments (conventional and organic cropping systems, crop rotations, and tillage) was subjected to geostatistical, covariance structure, variance components, and repeated measuresmultivariate analyses using six covariance models under restrictedmaximum likelihood. Differential buildup of the cumulative effects due to crop rotations being repeated over time was demonstrated by decreasing structured and unstructured variances and increasing range estimates in the geostatistical analyses. The magnitude and direction of relationships between cumulative yield and its temporal variance, and coefficient of variation shaped the covariance structures of both cropping systems, crop rotations, and phases within crop rotations and resulted in significant deviations of organic management practices from their conventional counterparts. The unstructured covariance model was the best to fit most factor-variable combinations; it was the most flexible, but most costly in terms of computation time and number of estimated parameters.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Organic and conventional tomato cropping systems
    Bettiol, W
    Ghini, R
    Galvao, JAH
    Siloto, RU
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2004, 61 (03) : 253 - 259
  • [2] Productivity of organic and conventional cropping systems
    Bruulsema, T
    ORGANIC AGRICULTURE: SUSTAINABILITY, MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2003, : 95 - 99
  • [3] Quality of tomatoes cultivated in the organic and conventional cropping systems
    Rodrigues Ferreira, Sila Mary
    Sossela de Freitas, Renato Joao
    Lazzari Karkle, Elisa Noemberg
    de Quadros, Diomar Augusto
    Tullio, Lindamir Tomczak
    de Lima, Jair Jose
    CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA DE ALIMENTOS, 2010, 30 (01): : 224 - 230
  • [4] CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC CROPPING SYSTEMS AT SUITIA .7. EARTHWORMS
    NUUTINEN, V
    HAUKKA, J
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND, 1990, 62 (04): : 357 - 367
  • [5] The performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year
    Lotter, DW
    Seidel, R
    Liebhardt, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2003, 18 (03): : 146 - 154
  • [6] ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL CROPPING SYSTEMS OF SUGARCANE
    Gonzalez-Cueto, O.
    Diego-Nava, F.
    Lopez-Bravo, E.
    Ferreira-Camacho, R.
    Zambrano-Casanova, D. E.
    Macias-Martinez, L. M.
    Herrera-Suarez, M.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2020, 63 (02) : 259 - 264
  • [7] CONVENTIONAL AND ORGANIC CROPPING SYSTEMS AT SUITIA .4. WEEDS
    KAUPPILA, R
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE IN FINLAND, 1990, 62 (04): : 331 - 337
  • [8] Nematode-trapping fungi in organic and conventional cropping systems
    Jaffee, BA
    Ferris, H
    Scow, KM
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1998, 88 (04) : 344 - 350
  • [9] Functional and Nutritional Characteristics of Wheat Grown in Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems
    Park, Eun Young
    Baik, Byung-Kee
    Miller, Perry R.
    Burke, Ian C.
    Wegner, Eric A.
    Tautges, Nicole E.
    Morris, Craig F.
    Fuerst, E. Patrick
    CEREAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 92 (05) : 504 - 512
  • [10] Drainage runoff and migration of mineral elements in organic and conventional cropping systems
    Sileika, AS
    Guzys, S
    AGRONOMIE, 2003, 23 (07): : 633 - 641