INTERPERSONAL DECEPTION .8. FURTHER ANALYSIS OF NONVERBAL AND VERBAL CORRELATES OF EQUIVOCATION FROM THE BAVELAS ET-AL (1990) RESEARCH

被引:27
作者
BULLER, DB [1 ]
BURGOON, JK [1 ]
BUSLIG, ALS [1 ]
ROIGER, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ARKANSAS,DIV ARTS & LANGUAGE,MONTICELLO,AR
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0261927X94134003
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article reports on a secondary analysis of five studies performed originally by Bavelas and colleagues in 1990 to further describe the behavioral profile associated with one common type of deception, equivocation. This analysis was grounded in Interpersonal Deception Theory (IDT) posited by Burgoon and Buller in 1994. Ratings of information dimensions revealed that equivocal statements were found to be less clear and conversationally complete than truthful statements. Nonverbal involvement, fluency, dominance, formality cues, time spent talking, response latency, smiling, nodding, and linguistic immediacy cues were compared in responses under conflict (equivocal statements) and no conflict (truthful statements). Consistent with IDT, senders enacted information management (appearing more withdrawn) and behavior management (being more kinesically expressive). Senders also showed arousal (more tension cues), negative affect (less pleasantness), and performance decrements (more filled pauses) when equivocating. This suggested that behavior management was achieved through interchannel compensation; however, equivocation consequently contained channel discrepancies. The behavioral profile of equivocation did not depart substantially from that associated with falsification. Rather, equivocation and falsification showed a general deception profile of greater kinesic expressiveness, shorter response latencies, and more linguistic immediacy in the experiment comparing truthful, falsified, and equivocal replies.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 417
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bavelas J. B., 1990, EQUIVOCAL COMMUNICAT
[2]   THE EFFECT OF PROBING ON DECEIVERS AND TRUTHTELLERS [J].
BULLER, DB ;
COMSTOCK, J ;
AUNE, RK ;
STRZYZEWSKI, KD .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1989, 13 (03) :155-170
[3]   INTERPERSONAL DECEPTION .1. DECEIVERS REACTIONS TO RECEIVERS SUSPICIONS AND PROBING [J].
BULLER, DB ;
STRZYZEWSKI, KD ;
COMSTOCK, J .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1991, 58 (01) :1-24
[4]   NONVERBAL CUES TO DECEPTION AMONG INTIMATES, FRIENDS, AND STRANGERS [J].
BULLER, DB ;
AUNE, RK .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1987, 11 (04) :269-290
[5]  
BULLER DB, 1994, COMMUNICATING STRATE, P191
[6]  
BULLER DB, 1994, 5TH ANN C LANG SOC P
[7]  
BULLER DB, 1994, INTERPERSONAL DECEPT, V10
[8]  
BURGOON J, IN PRESS INTERPERSON
[9]  
BURGOON JK, 1994, JUL ANN M INT COMM A
[10]  
Erikson F., 1979, NONVERBAL BEHAV APPL, P99