Hearing the voices of general staff: a Delphi study of the contributions of general staff to student outcomes

被引:17
作者
Graham, Carroll [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Delphi method; general staff; higher education; student outcomes;
D O I
10.1080/13600801003743315
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A university's key resource is its staff, both academic and general. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the work of general staff. Yet general staff comprise more than half the workforce in Australian universities and a more rigorous understanding of the contribution of general staff towards the strategic goals of their institutions has the potential to enhance their institutions' organisational sustainability. Universities have multiple and diverse stakeholders, but students are the key stakeholders in universities' core business of learning and teaching. Consequently, the interaction of general staff with students has potential to have an impact on the sustainability of an institution. This paper describes a preliminary study into how general staff contribute to student outcomes. A meta-study by Prebble et al. derived 13 propositions for support of student outcomes that focused on the contribution by academic staff and Middleton subsequently surmised that general staff are also central to those outcomes. This study uses the Delphi method to test Middleton's assertion by engaging general staff in ranking the propositions in terms of their contribution to student outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Examining the fabric of academic life: An analysis of three decades of research on the perceptions of Australian academics about their roles [J].
Adams, DI .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1998, 36 (04) :421-435
[2]  
Adler M, 1996, GAZING ORACLE DELPHI
[3]  
Conway M., 2000, J HIGH EDUC POLICY M, V22, P199, DOI DOI 10.1080/713678148
[4]  
Delbecq A., 1975, GROUP TECHNIQUES PRO
[5]  
*DEP ED EMPL WORKP, 2008, STUD 2007 FULL YEAR
[6]  
Department of Education Employment & Workplace Relations, 2009, STAFF 2008 SEL HIGH
[7]   THE DELPHI TECHNIQUE - A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OBTAINED USING 2 EXPERT PANELS [J].
DUFFIELD, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 1993, 30 (03) :227-237
[8]  
ELFORD IC, 1996, INT J ED MANAGEMENT, V10, P36
[9]   CONSENSUS METHODS - CHARACTERISTICS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE [J].
FINK, A ;
KOSECOFF, J ;
CHASSIN, M ;
BROOK, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (09) :979-983
[10]   Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique [J].
Hasson, F ;
Keeney, S ;
McKenna, H .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2000, 32 (04) :1008-1015