AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF REVEALED PREFERENCE THEORY

[1] SEPARABLE UTILITY AND AGGREGATION [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1959, 27 (03) : 469 - 481

[2] Hicks J. R, 1956, REVISION DEMAND THEO

[3] Revealed Preference and the Utility Function [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1950, 17 (66): : 159 - 174

[4] QUACKENBUSH GG, 1960, AGR EXPT STATION TEC, V279

[5] SAMUELSON PA, 1938, ECONOMICA FEB, P67

[6] SAMUELSON PA, 1948, F EC ANAL

[7] Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1948, 15 (60): : 243 - 253

[8] SPARKS WR, 1961, THESIS MICHIGAN STAT

[9] THE UTILITY TREE - A CORRECTION AND FURTHER APPRAISAL [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1959, 27 (03) : 482 - 488

[10] THE EMPIRICAL IMPLICATIONS OF A UTILITY TREE [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1957, 25 (02) : 269 - 280

[1] SEPARABLE UTILITY AND AGGREGATION [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1959, 27 (03) : 469 - 481

[2] Hicks J. R, 1956, REVISION DEMAND THEO

[3] Revealed Preference and the Utility Function [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1950, 17 (66): : 159 - 174

[4] QUACKENBUSH GG, 1960, AGR EXPT STATION TEC, V279

[5] SAMUELSON PA, 1938, ECONOMICA FEB, P67

[6] SAMUELSON PA, 1948, F EC ANAL

[7] Consumption Theory in Terms of Revealed Preference [J]. ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1948, 15 (60): : 243 - 253

[8] SPARKS WR, 1961, THESIS MICHIGAN STAT

[9] THE UTILITY TREE - A CORRECTION AND FURTHER APPRAISAL [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1959, 27 (03) : 482 - 488

[10] THE EMPIRICAL IMPLICATIONS OF A UTILITY TREE [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1957, 25 (02) : 269 - 280