CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF 3 POSTERIOR COMPOSITE AND 2 AMALGAM RESTORATIVE MATERIALS - 3-YEAR RESULTS

被引:14
|
作者
CUNNINGHAM, J
MAIR, LH
FOSTER, MA
IRELAND, RS
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.bdj.4807369
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The clinical performance of three posterior composites and two amalgams was evaluated over 3 years. Three hundred and nine composites and 200 amalgams were reviewed at the 3-year recall. The following parameters were assessed: fractures, gingival condition, interproximal contacts, marginal adaptation, staining and colour match. Although there was no significant difference in the overall failure rate between the two types of material, there was a significantly higher incidence of fracture in the amalgam restorations. The amalgam failures were exclusively mechanical, whereas those affecting composites also included failures that were more biological in nature. A significantly higher proportion of the Class II composites failed to achieve an adequate approximal contact, but this was not reflected in a more adverse gingival response. Colour match, surface and marginal stain varied significantly within the composite group and appeared to be material-related. Overall, the materials Occlusion and P-30 were considered to be performing adequately. The clinical handling, colour match and radiopacity of Clearfil Posterior were considered to be unsatisfactory. © 1990 Nature Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 323
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF A POSTERIOR COMPOSITE (3-YEAR RESULTS)
    SETCOS, JC
    BASSIOUNY, MA
    BRUNSON, WD
    NORMAN, RD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1987, 66 : 129 - 129
  • [2] COMPOSITE VERSUS AMALGAM RESTORATIONS - A 3-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION
    HENDRIKS, FHJ
    LETZEL, H
    VRIJHOEF, MMA
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1986, 13 (05) : 401 - 411
  • [3] A 3-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE RESIN AND A HIGH COPPER AMALGAM IN POSTERIOR PRIMARY TEETH
    NELSON, GV
    OSBORNE, JW
    GALE, EN
    NORMAN, RD
    PHILLIPS, RW
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1980, 47 (06): : 414 - 418
  • [4] 3-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE FORMULATIONS FOR POSTERIOR TEETH
    FELLER, RP
    RICKS, CL
    MATTHEWS, TG
    SANTUCCI, EA
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1987, 57 (05): : 544 - 550
  • [5] A 3-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF 3 POSTERIOR RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    LIGHT, E
    BALBO, M
    HOLMES, L
    RAKOW, B
    SANTUCCI, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 : 671 - 671
  • [6] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF 4 POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS - 3-YEAR REPORT
    SWIJNENBURG, JT
    KORTLAND, PJ
    LUXWOLDA, RJ
    DELANGE, C
    BAUSCH, JR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1988, 67 (04) : 689 - 689
  • [7] A VISIBLE LIGHT-CURED POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESIN - RESULTS OF A 3-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION
    BOKSMAN, L
    JORDAN, RE
    SUZUKI, M
    CHARLES, DH
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 112 (05): : 627 - 631
  • [8] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF AMALGAM RESTORATIONS - 3 YEAR RESULTS
    RYDINGE, E
    GOLDBERG, AJ
    LAMBERT, K
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 : 520 - 520
  • [9] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF SCOTCHBOND - 3-YEAR RESULTS
    TYAS, MJ
    BURNS, GA
    BYRNE, PF
    CUNNINGHAM, PJ
    DOBSON, BC
    WIDDOP, FT
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1989, 34 (03) : 277 - 279
  • [10] CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS - 3 AND 4 YEAR RESULTS
    DERKSON, GD
    RICHARDSON, AS
    WALDMAN, R
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 63 : 174 - 174