RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH NODE DISSECTION AFTER INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY IN METASTATIC TESTICULAR NON-SEMINOMA

被引:0
作者
Matveev, V. B. [1 ]
Figurin, K. M. [1 ]
Volkova, M. I. [1 ]
Chernyaev, V. A. [1 ]
Mitin, A. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] NN Blokhin Canc Res Ctr, Moscow, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2010年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词
metastatic testicular non-seminoma; retroperitoneal lymph node dissection; induction chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: to evaluate the outcome of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) in disseminated testicular non-seminoma patients with residual metastases after induction chemotherapy. Material and methods. The RLND performed in 1983 to 2007 were analyzed in 367 testicular non-seminoma patients with residual retroperitoneal masses after ineffective induction chemotherapy. The median age was 26.0 +/- 6.9 years. Orchidectomy was performed in all patients. Category N1 was regarded in 12 (3.3%) patients, N2 in 79 (21.5%), N3 in 238 (64.9%), Nx in 38 (10.4%). Distant metastases were present in 133 (36.2%) cases. The baseline tumor marker level was elevated in 328 (89.4%) patients (S1 in 169 (46.0%), S2 in 108 (29.4%), S3 in 51 (13.9%), Sx in 39 (10.6%)). According to the IGCCCG prognostic model, 149 (40.6%) patients were classified as good prognostic group, 100 (27.2%) as moderate, 77 (21.0%) as poor ones; the prognostic group was not defined in 41 (11.2%) cases who had started treatment at another facility due to data unavailability. After orchifuniculectomy, all patients received induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy which resulted in tumor shrinkage < 50% in 70 (19.1%), 51-90% in 166 (45.2%), and >90% - in 29 (7.9%) cases. The response was not properly assessed in 102 (27.8%) cases. CT scan revealed residual retroperitoneal masses after chemotherapy in all patients (< 2 cm - 52 (14.2%), 2-5 cm - 166 (45.2%), > 5 cm - 149 (40.6%)). The tumor markers level remained elevated following chemotherapy in 70 (19.1%) cases. All patients underwent RLND (complete in 295 (80.4%) cases). Radical RLND demanded resection of adjacent organs in 22 (5.9%) cases. Extraretroperitoneal metastases were removed simultaneously with retroperitoneal tumor in 22 (5.9%) patients. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered in 100 (27.2%) cases. The median follow-up was 82.1 (3-188) months. Results. Complications developed in 31 (8.5%) of the 367 of patients. Mortality rate was 0.6% (2/367 cases). Resection of the adjacent organs did not influence mortality rates. Histology revealed necrosis in 149 (40.6%), teratoma in 141 (38.4%), cancer in 77 (21.0%) specimens. The significant predictive factors for necrosis were normal levels of markers following chemotherapy, a residual mass size of < 2 cm, tumor shrinkage > 90% (the accuracy of the logistic model for probability of necrosis in the removed specimen was 78%). Discordant pathologic findings between the retroperitoneum and other metastatic sites were in 3 (13.6%) of 22 cases. Ten-year overall, specific and progression-free survival (PFS) was 92.1, 92.4, and 46%, respectively. A poor and moderate prognostic group IGCCCG (p<0.0001), incomplete resection of residual mass (p<0.0001) and presence of cancer in the removed specimens (p<0.0001), initial retroperitoneal masses > 5 cm (p=0.042), presence of extraretroperitoneal metastases (p<0.0001), category S>S1 (p<0.0001), positive marker levels after induction (p=0.048) were found to have an adverse impact on PFS. Removal of residual extraretroperitoneal metastases after chemotherapy improved progression-free survival (p=0.022). Postoperative chemotherapy did not influence survival significantly. Multivariate analysis confirmed the predictive value of the radicality of RLND (p=0.036). Conclusion. Radical RLND improves the results of combined treatment in metastatic testicular non-seminoma. It is expedient to make resection of the adjacent organs and extraretroperitoneal metastasectomy in order to achieve a complete removal of residual masses. Whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be used in cases with cancer in residual mass is under discussion.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 58
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] COMPLICATIONS OF PRIMARY RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION
    BANIEL, J
    FOSTER, RS
    ROWLAND, RG
    BIHRLE, R
    DONOHUE, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (02) : 424 - 427
  • [2] Outcome analysis for patients with elevated serum tumor markers at postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
    Beck, SDW
    Foster, RS
    Bihrle, R
    Einhorn, LH
    Donohue, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (25) : 6149 - 6156
  • [3] The incidence and implications of disease outside a modified template in men undergoing post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT)
    Carver, BS
    Shayegan, B
    Motzer, RJ
    Stasi, J
    Bajorin, DF
    Bosl, GJ
    Sheinfeld, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04) : 192 - 192
  • [4] CORRELATION OF COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHIC CHANGES AND HISTOLOGICAL-FINDINGS IN 80 PATIENTS HAVING RADICAL RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY FOR TESTIS CANCER
    DONOHUE, JP
    ROWLAND, RG
    KOPECKY, K
    STEIDLE, CP
    GEIER, G
    NEY, KG
    EINHORN, L
    WILLIAMS, S
    LOEHRER, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (06) : 1176 - 1179
  • [5] SURGICAL RESECTION IN PATIENTS WITH NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMOR WHO FAIL TO NORMALIZE SERUM TUMOR-MARKERS AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY
    EASTHAM, JA
    WILSON, TG
    RUSSELL, C
    AHLERING, TE
    SKINNER, DG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [6] Fizazi K., 2005, J CLIN ONCOL, V23, P4521
  • [7] OUTCOME ANALYSIS FOR PATIENTS WITH PERSISTENT NONTERATOMATOUS GERM-CELL TUMOR IN POSTCHEMOTHERAPY RETROPERITONEAL LYMPH-NODE DISSECTIONS
    FOX, EP
    WEATHERS, TD
    WILLIAMS, SD
    LOEHRER, PJ
    ULBRIGHT, TM
    DONOHUE, JP
    EINHORN, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (07) : 1294 - 1299
  • [8] Comparison of histological results from the resection of residual masses at different sites after chemotherapy for metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours
    Hartmann, JT
    Candelaria, M
    Kuczyk, MA
    Schmoll, HJ
    Bokemeyer, C
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (06) : 843 - 847
  • [9] THE IMPORTANCE OF ONE-STAGE MEDIAN STERNOTOMY AND RETROPERITONEAL NODE DISSECTION IN DISSEMINATED TESTICULAR CANCER
    MANDELBAUM, I
    YAW, PB
    EINHORN, LH
    WILLIAMS, SD
    ROWLAND, RG
    DONOHUE, JP
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1983, 36 (05) : 524 - 528
  • [10] THE IMPORTANCE OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN THE INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DISSEMINATED GERM-CELL TUMORS
    MULDERS, PFA
    OOSTERHOF, GON
    BOETES, C
    DEMULDER, PHM
    THEEUWES, AGM
    DEBRUYNE, FMJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 66 (04): : 425 - 429