Effect of preoperative oral amantadine on intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements in female patients during abdominoplasty

被引:4
作者
Abdelmawgoud, Ashraf
Rashwan, Samaa
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Beni Sueif Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia, Beni Sueif, Egypt
关键词
Amantadine; Propofol; Isoflurane; BIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egja.2012.09.001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: We hypothesized that NMDA antagonist, amantadine, may be beneficial in reducing the intraoperative a nesthetic and analgesic requirements. The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of preoperative oral amantadine on induction doses of propofol, intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements. Methods: In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled study 60 female patients ASA I or II aged 18-60 years old, planned for abdominoplasty surgery divided into two groups (30 patients each). Group A: received oral amantadine 200 mg on the evening before surgery and 200 mg 60 min prior to surgery. Group P (control group): the patients received placebo capsules. Propofol and isoflurane were titrated guided by BIS during induction and maintenance of anesthesia where the total dose of propofol and the time elapsed between injection of propofol to achieve BIS value 60 were recorded. Also, the inspired isoflurane concentrations required to maintain BIS between 40 and 60 and the total dose of fentanyl needed to maintain adequate analgesia were recorded. Results: The induction dose of propofol and the time from propofol injection till BIS value reached 60, the total intraoperative fentanyl requirements and the inspired isoflurane concentration required to maintain BIS reading between 40 and 60 were statistically significant lower in amantadine group compared to placebo treated group. The two groups were similar regarding the occurrence of side effects. Conclusion: Preoperative oral amantadine reduced the induction time, induction dose of propofol, intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements compared to placebo without serious side effects in female patients during abdominoplasty. (C) 2012 Egyptian Society of Anesthesiologists. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND license.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 11
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Abu-Samra MM, 2009, SAUDI MED J, V30, P214
[2]   THE NONCOMPETITIVE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE ANTAGONISTS, MK-801, PHENCYCLIDINE AND KETAMINE, INCREASE THE POTENCY OF GENERAL-ANESTHETICS [J].
DANIELL, LC .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1990, 36 (01) :111-115
[3]   Amantadine, a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, does not enhance postoperative analgesia in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy [J].
Gottschalk, A ;
Schroeder, F ;
Ufer, M ;
Oncü, A ;
Buerkle, H ;
Standl, T .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (01) :192-196
[4]  
Heidari Saied Morteza, 2006, Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, V44, P211
[5]  
Kawamata T, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V86, P594
[6]   A qualitative systematic review of the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists in preventive analgesia [J].
McCartney, CJL ;
Sinha, A ;
Katz, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (05) :1385-1400
[7]   Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial [J].
Myles, PS ;
Leslie, K ;
McNeil, J ;
Forbes, A ;
Chan, MTV .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9423) :1757-1763
[8]   Preoperative oral dextromethorphan does not reduce pain or morphine consumption after open cholecystectomy [J].
Mziahnioodzadeh, Hossein ;
Movglegh, Ali ;
Beigi, Noshin Mosavi .
SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 3 (02) :57-60
[9]   Preoperative oral dextromethorphan does not reduce pain or analgesic consumption in children after adenotonsillectomy [J].
Rose, JB ;
Cuy, R ;
Cohen, DE ;
Schreiner, MS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 88 (04) :749-753
[10]   Effects of magnesium sulphate on intraoperative anaesthetic requirements and postoperative analgesia in gynaecology patients receiving total intravenous anaesthesia [J].
Ryu, J. -H. ;
Kang, M. -H. ;
Park, K. -S. ;
Do, S. -H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (03) :397-403