A multi-criteria decision-making model for the justification of lean manufacturing systems

被引:38
作者
Gurumurthy, Anand [1 ]
Kodali, Rambabu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Birla Inst Technol & Sci BITS, Mech Engn Grp, Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India
[2] Birla Inst Technol & Sci BITS, Engn Technol Grp, Pilani 333031, Rajasthan, India
关键词
lean manufacturing; justification; performance value analysis; multi-attribute decision making;
D O I
10.1080/17509653.2008.10671039
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In recent years, organisations are facing stiff competition in both domestic as well as global markets due to the impact of globalisation and rapid development of technologies. To achieve a competitive advantage over other firms in these circumstances, some managers' attempt to transform their organisation by implementing highly successful management philosophies proposed by Japanese and Western management gurus, such as Just-In-Time (JIT), Total Quality Management (TQM), Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), Six-Sigma (SS), Lean Manufacturing Systems (LMS) etc. On the other hand, some managers' bank on highly sophisticated, technology based systems such as Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS), Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems (CIMS), Information Systems (IS) that enable e-business through the use of software packages for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Supply Chain Management (SCM), Customer Relationship Management (CRM) etc. But an intriguing question that has not been answered completely is: 'how do managers make a decision of implementing a 'management based and people oriented philosophy and practice' (say LMS) or a technically sophisticated system (say CIMS)?' Implementing such massive change management programmes require a strong justification for the managers to convince the top management, as it involves huge investment and creates a longstanding impact on various resources. But such justification problems are quite complex. Traditional techniques cannot be applied as they do not account for intangible factors and benefits offered, which necessitate the use of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) models. Hence in this paper, an attempt has been made to demonstrate the application of a MCDM model, namely, the Performance Value Analysis (PVA) to analyse the alternatives (i.e., change management programmes) based on its impact on various performance measures of an organisation. A detailed algorithm of the PVA model is demonstrated using a case situation, which showed that LMS is the best for the given situation, as it results in overall improvement in the performance of the organisation.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 118
页数:19
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Anand G., 2007, PERFORMANCE MEASUREM
[2]   CIM: Getting set for implementation [J].
Attaran, M .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 1997, 97 (1-2) :3-+
[3]  
BENNETT RE, 1987, MANAGEMENT ACCOU JUL, P39
[4]   JUSTIFICATION OF COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING - SOME INSIGHTS INTO THE PRACTICE [J].
BOADEN, RJ ;
DALE, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1990, 37 (04) :291-296
[5]   An empirical study of lean production in the ceramic tile industry in Spain [J].
Bonavia, Tomas ;
Marin, Juan Antonio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (5-6) :505-531
[6]  
Canada J. R., 1986, Engineering Economist, V31, P137, DOI 10.1080/00137918608902932
[7]   Computer integrated manufacturing in small companies: a case study [J].
Caputo, AC ;
Cardarelli, G ;
Palumbo, M ;
Pelagagge, PM .
INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 1998, 98 (3-4) :138-+
[8]  
Chan P.K., 2000, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V17, P144, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656710010304555
[9]   Economic view of CIM system architecture [J].
Chen, YL ;
Tseng, MM ;
Yien, J .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 1998, 9 (03) :241-249
[10]   Automation, motivation and lean production reconsidered [J].
Coffey, D ;
Thornley, C .
ASSEMBLY AUTOMATION, 2006, 26 (02) :98-103