Work and Neoliberal Globalization: A Polanyian Synthesis

被引:15
作者
Bandelj, Nina [1 ,2 ]
Shorette, Kristen [3 ]
Sowers, Elizabeth [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Sociol, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Study Democracy, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Sociol, 3151 Social Sci Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00408.x
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This article reviews sociological research about economic globalization's impact on work and labor in developed and developing countries since the 1980s. We find that this period of neoliberal globalization influences work because of intensified activities of multinational corporations (MNCs), financialization of the global economy, and amplified prominence of international organizations, some of which diffuse neoliberal policy scripts while others mobilize a transnational civil society. Research we review generally points to liabilities of neoliberal globalization for workers. To understand these findings, we apply Karl Polanyi's concepts of fictitious commodities, the selfregulating market, and the double movement. We propose that, on the one hand, the activities of MNCs, international financial organizations, and many states exemplify pushes for institutional separation of economy and society in effort to institutionalize the idea of a self-regulating market at a global scale, which increases labor commodification and global inequalities. On the other hand, the activities of social movements, including unions and transnational actors that target globalization's impact on work, constitute the counter movement at national and global levels resisting marketization and pushing for labor decommodification. The aftermath of the ongoing economic crisis will tell to what extent this countermovement will be successful in generating an alternative to neoliberal globalization, and more protections for workers.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 823
页数:17
相关论文
共 162 条
[1]   Globalization and the great U-turn: Income inequality trends in 16 OECD countries [J].
Alderson, AS ;
Nielsen, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2002, 107 (05) :1244-1299
[2]   Risk, reward and discipline at work [J].
Amoore, L .
ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2004, 33 (02) :174-196
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CHANGING CONTOURS WO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, FRONTIERS COMMODITY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NEXT UPSURGE LABOR N
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FINANCIALIZATION WOR
[7]   Innovation, Working Conditions and Industrial Relations: Evidence for a Local Production System [J].
Antonioli, Davide ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano ;
Pini, Paolo .
ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 2009, 30 (02) :157-181
[8]  
Applebaum Richard P., 1994, GLOBAL PRODUCTION AP, P42
[9]  
Archibald WP, 2009, CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, V35, P319, DOI DOI 10.1177/
[10]   Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide [J].
Arrighi, G ;
Silver, BJ ;
Brewer, BD .
STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 38 (01) :3-31