Quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Tang, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Crane, Christopher H. [3 ]
Eng, Cathy [4 ]
Minsky, Bruce D. [3 ]
Delclos, Marc E. [3 ]
Krishnan, Sunil [3 ]
Malatek, Daniel [3 ]
Gould, Morris S. [3 ]
Das, Prajnan [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Anal cancer; Quality of life; Radiotherapy; Long-term effects;
D O I
10.1007/s13566-015-0209-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anal cancer. Methods Between 2007 and 2011, 63 patients with anal cancer were treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy, and achieved complete response. These patients completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Problems Scale (MOS-SPS) questionnaires during follow-up visits. Results Thirty-four patients (54 %) answered at least one questionnaire. Among them, the median radiation dose was 54 Gy to the tumor and 45 Gy to the pelvis. The median interval between treatment and the latest questionnaire was 33 months. On the latest questionnaires, the median total FACT-C score was 111, out of maximum (best possible) score 136. The median scores on the Physical, Social/Family, Emotional Functional, and Colorectal subscales were 24, 24, 19, 21, and 21, out of maximum (best possible) scores 28, 28, 24, 28 and 28, respectively. The median score on the MOS Sexual Problems Scale was 62, out of maximum (worst possible) score 100. Patients with lymph node involvement reported worse total FACT-C scores (p = 0.048), as well as worse Social/Family (p = 0.026) and Emotional (p = 0.032) subscale scores. A history of depression/anxiety was significantly associated with worse Physical (p = 0.034) and Emotional (p = 0.003) subscale scores. The use of vaginal dilator during treatment significantly improved Social/Family subscale scores (p = 0.031). Conclusion Overall quality of life scores were acceptable, but sexual functioning scores were suboptimal after IMRT for anal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Health-related quality-of-life after external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus conformal radiation therapy
    K Yoshimura
    T Kamoto
    E Nakamura
    T Segawa
    T Kamba
    T Takahashi
    H Nishiyama
    N Ito
    K Takayama
    T Mizowaki
    M Mitsumori
    M Hiraoka
    O Ogawa
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2007, 10 : 288 - 292
  • [22] Salivary flow rate after conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Caroline Tram Nguyen
    Lin, Spencer
    Clark, Haley
    Hovan, Allan
    Wu, Jonn
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 149 (06) : 432 - 441
  • [23] Longitudinal change in health-related quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Shinya Yamamoto
    Yasuhisa Fujii
    Hitoshi Masuda
    Shinji Urakami
    Kazutaka Saito
    Takuyo Kozuka
    Masahiko Oguchi
    Iwao Fukui
    Junji Yonese
    Quality of Life Research, 2014, 23 : 1641 - 1650
  • [24] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anal Canal
    Bazan, Jose G.
    Hara, Wendy
    Hsu, Annie
    Kunz, Pamela A.
    Ford, James
    Fisher, George A.
    Welton, Mark L.
    Shelton, Andrew
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    Koong, Albert C.
    Goodman, Karyn A.
    Chang, Daniel T.
    CANCER, 2011, 117 (15) : 3342 - 3351
  • [25] Longitudinal change in health-related quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Urakami, Shinji
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Kozuka, Takuyo
    Oguchi, Masahiko
    Fukui, Iwao
    Yonese, Junji
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (05) : 1641 - 1650
  • [26] Radiotherapy for Anal Cancer Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Future Directions
    Castaneda, Serguei A.
    Romak, Lindsay B.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 26 (03) : 467 - +
  • [27] Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer
    Vieillot, Sabine
    Azria, David
    Lemanski, Claire
    Moscardo, Carmen Llacer
    Gourgou, Sophie
    Dubois, Jean-Bernard
    Ailleres, Norbert
    Fenoglietto, Pascal
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 5
  • [28] Impact of intensity modulated radiation therapy on survival in anal cancer
    Jhaveri, Jaymin
    Rayfield, Lael
    Liu, Yuan
    Chowdhary, Mudit
    Tian, Sibo
    Cassidy, Richard J.
    Gillespie, Theresa
    Patel, Pretesh R.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    Patel, Kirtesh R.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 618 - +
  • [29] Urologists' Use of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Mitchell, Jean M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (17) : 1629 - 1637
  • [30] DOSE-PAINTED INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY FOR ANAL CANCER: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL REPORT OF ACUTE TOXICITY AND RESPONSE TO THERAPY
    Kachnic, Lisa A.
    Tsai, Henry K.
    Coen, John J.
    Blaszkowsky, Lawrence S.
    Hartshorn, Kevan
    Kwak, Eunice L.
    Willins, John D.
    Ryan, David P.
    Hong, Theodore S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (01): : 153 - 158