Quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Tang, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Crane, Christopher H. [3 ]
Eng, Cathy [4 ]
Minsky, Bruce D. [3 ]
Delclos, Marc E. [3 ]
Krishnan, Sunil [3 ]
Malatek, Daniel [3 ]
Gould, Morris S. [3 ]
Das, Prajnan [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp, Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Anal cancer; Quality of life; Radiotherapy; Long-term effects;
D O I
10.1007/s13566-015-0209-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anal cancer. Methods Between 2007 and 2011, 63 patients with anal cancer were treated with IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy, and achieved complete response. These patients completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Problems Scale (MOS-SPS) questionnaires during follow-up visits. Results Thirty-four patients (54 %) answered at least one questionnaire. Among them, the median radiation dose was 54 Gy to the tumor and 45 Gy to the pelvis. The median interval between treatment and the latest questionnaire was 33 months. On the latest questionnaires, the median total FACT-C score was 111, out of maximum (best possible) score 136. The median scores on the Physical, Social/Family, Emotional Functional, and Colorectal subscales were 24, 24, 19, 21, and 21, out of maximum (best possible) scores 28, 28, 24, 28 and 28, respectively. The median score on the MOS Sexual Problems Scale was 62, out of maximum (worst possible) score 100. Patients with lymph node involvement reported worse total FACT-C scores (p = 0.048), as well as worse Social/Family (p = 0.026) and Emotional (p = 0.032) subscale scores. A history of depression/anxiety was significantly associated with worse Physical (p = 0.034) and Emotional (p = 0.003) subscale scores. The use of vaginal dilator during treatment significantly improved Social/Family subscale scores (p = 0.031). Conclusion Overall quality of life scores were acceptable, but sexual functioning scores were suboptimal after IMRT for anal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 298
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique on xerostomia and related quality of life in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer
    Marucci, Laura
    Marzi, Simona
    Sperduti, Isabella
    Giovinazzo, Giuseppe
    Pinnaro, Paola
    Benassi, Marcello
    Strigari, Lidia
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2012, 34 (03): : 328 - 335
  • [2] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for anal carcinoma
    Peiffert, D.
    Moreau-Claeys, M. -V.
    Tournier-Rangeard, L.
    Huger, S.
    Marchesi, V.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2011, 15 (6-7): : 549 - 554
  • [3] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: An Obvious yet Complicated Transition
    Herman, Joseph M.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2010, 24 (09): : 828 - 831
  • [4] Toxicity and survival of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Ghareeb, A.
    Paramasevon, K.
    Mokool, P.
    van der Voet, H.
    Jha, M.
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2019, 101 (03) : 168 - 175
  • [5] Longitudinal assessment of quality of life after surgery, conformal brachytherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Poon, Bing Ying
    Eastham, James
    Vickers, Andrew
    Pei, Xin
    Scardino, Peter T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [6] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Anal Cancer: Toxicity versus Outcomes
    Zagar, Timothy M.
    Willett, Christopher G.
    Czito, Brian G.
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2010, 24 (09): : 815 - 828
  • [7] Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Anal Cancer Outcomes and Toxicity
    Mitchell, Melissa P.
    Abboud, Mirna
    Eng, Cathy
    Beddar, A. Sam
    Krishnan, Sunil
    Delclos, Marc E.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    Das, Prajnan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 37 (05): : 461 - 466
  • [8] Global and health-related quality of life after intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer
    Hess, Clayton B.
    Chen, Allen M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2012, 12 (11) : 1469 - 1477
  • [9] Role of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer
    Bockbrader, Marcia
    Kim, Edward
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (05) : 637 - 647
  • [10] Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer
    Ling, Diane C.
    Beriwal, Sushil
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 112 (04): : 1063 - 1064