The development of a tool for measuring the implementation of stewardship in public health

被引:0
作者
La Torre, Giuseppe [1 ,2 ]
de Belvis, Antonio Giulio [3 ]
Di Thiene, Domitilla [1 ]
Saulle, Rosella [1 ]
Marino, Marta [3 ]
Specchia, Maria Lucia [3 ]
Villari, Paolo [1 ]
Ricciardi, Walter [3 ]
Boccia, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Publ Hlth & Infect Dis, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn Eleonora Lorillard Spencer Cenci, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Inst Hyg, Rome, Italy
来源
EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOSTATISTICS AND PUBLIC HEALTH | 2012年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Stewardship; Prevention; Public Health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Stewardship is contemplated as a way to make the National Health Service more efficient and effective within the context of devolution. In December 2010, the Minister of Health commissioned the University of "Sapienza" and "Cattolica" of Rome the task of testing and ensuring that we have the appropriate tools for evaluating the implementation level of Stewardship as part of the realization of the Actions contemplated in the National Prevention Plan and their application to the Italian Regions context. Methods: the method of analysis included two phases: 1) implementation of the evaluation model and assessment tool; 2) validation of the tool, with the objective of ascertaining its technical-informational functionality. The questionnaire included 141 answers in a closed format (singles or multiples) and was subdivided into five areas of analysis. Every function of Stewardship was adjusted by a "weight" and a score (from 0 to 5) assigned by a panel of experts was applied to each item. Results: "Ensuring Accountability" was indicated as the most important Stewardship function. "Ensuring accountability", "Leadership", "Resources Management and services", "Accountability" and "Evidence based medicine/ Evidence based prevention", respectively, characterized each function. Responses were received from 75% of experts. Moreover, suggestions were collected for each question. Conclusions: Considering this relatively new field of interest, to date there are no tools for looking at all aspects of stewardship. However, a rigorous instrument could be crucial for the success of policies. The proposed method could enable one to assess the level of Stewardship implementation, and to compare and propose actions for improvement. This could be essential to achieving the highest levels of quality in Public Health.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 114
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Block P., 1993, STEWARDSHIP CHOOSING
[2]  
Donatini A, 2009, HLTH SYST TRANSIT, V11, P1
[3]  
Federici A, 2008, CARE, V6, P31
[4]  
Ministero della Salute, 2010, PIAN NAZ PREV 2010 2
[5]  
Novinskey CM, 2011, EPIDEMIOL BIOSTAT PU, V8, P207
[6]  
Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, 2010, C PERM RAPP STAT REG
[7]   Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction [J].
Puliti, D. ;
Miccinesi, G. ;
Collina, N. ;
De Lisi, V. ;
Federico, M. ;
Ferretti, S. ;
Finarelli, A. C. ;
Foca, F. ;
Mangone, L. ;
Naldoni, C. ;
Petrella, M. ;
Ponti, A. ;
Segnan, N. ;
Sigona, A. ;
Zarcone, M. ;
Zorzi, M. ;
Zappa, M. ;
Paci, E. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 99 (03) :423-427
[8]  
Roberts MJ, 2004, GETTING HLTH REFORM
[9]  
Saltman RB, 2000, WHO B, V78, P733
[10]  
Saltman RB, 1997, EUROPEAN HLTH CARE R