Investigating the impact of design characteristics on statistical efficiency within discrete choice experiments: A systematic survey

被引:8
作者
Vanniyasingam, Thuva [1 ,2 ]
Daly, Caitlin [1 ]
Jin, Xuejing [1 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Foster, Gary [1 ,2 ]
Cunningham, Charles [3 ]
Thabane, Lehana [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Impact & Evidence, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] St Josephs Healthcare, Father Sean OSullivan Res Ctr, Biostat Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Paediat & Anaesthesia, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] St Josephs Healthcare, Ctr Evaluat Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Systematic survey; Statistical efficiency; Relative D-efficiency; Relative D-error;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.002
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study reviews simulation studies of discrete choice experiments to determine (i) how survey design features affect statistical efficiency, (ii) and to appraise their reporting quality. Outcomes: Statistical efficiency was measured using relative design (D-) efficiency, D-optimality, or D-error. Methods: For this systematic survey, we searched Journal Storage (JSTOR), Since Direct, PubMed, and OVID which included a search within EMBASE. Searches were conducted up to year 2016 for simulation studies investigating the impact of DCE design features on statistical efficiency. Studies were screened and data were extracted independently and in duplicate. Results for each included study were summarized by design characteristic. Previously developed criteria for reporting quality of simulation studies were also adapted and applied to each included study. Results: Of 371 potentially relevant studies, 9 were found to be eligible, with several varying in study objectives. Statistical efficiency improved when increasing the number of choice tasks or alternatives; decreasing the number of attributes, attribute levels; using an unrestricted continuous "manipulator" attribute; using modelbased approaches with covariates incorporating response behaviour; using sampling approaches that incorporate previous knowledge of response behaviour; incorporating heterogeneity in a model-based design; correctly specifying Bayesian priors; minimizing parameter prior variances; and using an appropriate method to create the DCE design for the research question. The simulation studies performed well in terms of reporting quality. Improvement is needed in regards to clearly specifying study objectives, number of failures, random number generators, starting seeds, and the software used. Conclusion: These results identify the best approaches to structure a DCE. An investigator can manipulate design characteristics to help reduce response burden and increase statistical efficiency. Since studies varied in their objectives, conclusions were made on several design characteristics, however, the validity of each conclusion was limited. Further research should be conducted to explore all conclusions in various design settings and scenarios. Additional reviews to explore other statistical efficiency outcomes and databases can also be performed to enhance the conclusions identified from this review.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 28
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments
    Arora, N
    Huber, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (02) : 273 - 283
  • [2] Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs An empirical study in air travel choice
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    Rose, John M.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2011, 45 (01) : 63 - 79
  • [3] Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations
    Bliemer, Michiel C. J.
    Rose, John M.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2010, 44 (06) : 720 - 734
  • [4] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [5] The design of simulation studies in medical statistics
    Burton, Andrea
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Royston, Patrick
    Holder, Roger L.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (24) : 4279 - 4292
  • [6] Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics
    Carlsson, F
    Martinsson, P
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (04) : 281 - 294
  • [7] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
    Clark, Michael D.
    Determann, Domino
    Petrou, Stavros
    Moro, Domenico
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) : 883 - 902
  • [8] Improving the efficiency of individualized designs for the mixed logit choice model by including covariates
    Crabbe, M.
    Vandebroek, M.
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2012, 56 (06) : 2059 - 2072
  • [9] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ryan, Mandy
    Gerard, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) : 145 - 172
  • [10] Decalf V. H., 2017, DRUGS AGING