Collecting and using Weigh-in-Motion data in LRFD bridge design

被引:7
|
作者
Sivakumar, Bala [1 ]
Ghosn, Michel [2 ]
机构
[1] HNTB Corp, New York, NY 10118 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, New York, NY 10031 USA
关键词
bridge live load models; Weigh-in-Motion (WIM); Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD); bridge design; truck weights;
D O I
10.1080/15732480903143045
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The HL-93, a combination of the HS20 truck and lane loads along with the AASHTO LRFD live load factors were calibrated using 1975 truck data from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation to project a 75-year live load occurrence. Because truck traffic volume and weights have increased and truck configurations have become more complex, the 1975 Ontario data do not represent present US traffic loadings. Updating bridge live load models needs representative samples of unbiased truck weight data that meet accepted quality standards. A method that has been developed over the last three decades to capture truck loads in an undetected manner and obtain a true unbiased representation of actual highway loads is known as the Weigh-in-Motion, or WIM technology. The implementation of WIM systems in recent years has led to improving the quality and quantity of traffic data, which can be used to update the bridge design loads. The goal of NCHRP Project 12-76 was to develop a set of protocols and methodologies for using available recent WIM data collected at different US sites and recommend a step-by-step procedure that can be followed to obtain live load models for LRFD bridge design. The protocols are geared to address the collection, processing and use of national WIM data to develop and calibrate vehicular loads for LRFD superstructure design, fatigue design, deck design and design for overload permits. The recommended protocols were implemented using recent traffic data from 26 WIM sites in five states across the country. The states were California, Texas, Florida, Indiana and Mississippi. The states and WIM sites were chosen to capture a variety of geographic locations and functional classes, ranging from urban interstates, rural interstates and state routes.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 158
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adjusting AASHTO LRFD design live load using recent weigh-in-motion data
    Sivakumar, B.
    BRIDGE MAINTENANCE, SAFETY, MANAGEMENT AND LIFE EXTENSION, 2014, : 385 - 390
  • [2] Model Updating Concept Using Bridge Weigh-in-Motion Data
    Hekic, Doron
    Anzlin, Andrej
    Kreslin, Maja
    Znidaric, Ales
    Cesarek, Peter
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (04)
  • [3] Data-Driven Bridge Weigh-in-Motion
    Kawakatsu, Takaya
    Aihara, Kenro
    Takasu, Atsuhiro
    Nagayama, Tomonori
    Adachi, Jun
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (15) : 17064 - 17077
  • [4] Enhancement of bridge live loads using weigh-in-motion data
    Sivakumar, Bala
    Ibrahim, Firas I. Sheikh
    BRIDGE STRUCTURES, 2007, 3 (3-4) : 193 - 204
  • [5] A BRIDGE DESIGN AND EVALUATION METHOD DERIVED FROM WEIGH-IN-MOTION DATA
    HEYWOOD, RJ
    OCONNOR, C
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1992, 19 (03) : 423 - 431
  • [6] Measurements of bridge dynamic amplification factor using bridge weigh-in-motion data
    Kalin, Jan
    Znidaric, Ales
    Anzlin, Andrej
    Kreslin, Maja
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (08) : 1164 - 1176
  • [7] Contactless Bridge Weigh-in-Motion
    Ojio, T.
    Carey, C. H.
    OBrien, E. J.
    Doherty, C.
    Taylor, S. E.
    JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2016, 21 (07)
  • [8] Review of bridge weigh-in-motion
    Li, Xiaonian
    Chen, Airong
    Ma, Rujin
    Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46 (03): : 79 - 85
  • [9] Probabilistic bridge weigh-in-motion
    OBrien, Eugene J.
    Zhang, Longwei
    Zhao, Hua
    Hajializadeh, Donya
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 45 (08) : 667 - 675
  • [10] Using weigh-in-motion data to determine bridge dynamic amplification factor
    Kalin, Jan
    Znidaric, Ales
    Kreslin, Maja
    EVACES'15, 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EXPERIMENTAL VIBRATION ANALYSIS FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2015, 24