To What Ends EU Foreign Policy? Contending Approaches to the Union's Diplomatic Objectives and Representation

被引:5
作者
Thomas, Daniel C. [1 ]
Tonra, Ben [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, UCD Sch Polit & Int Relat, Dublin European Inst, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
European Union (EU); foreign policy; common foreign and security policy (CFSP); interests; preferences; identity;
D O I
10.1163/187119112X609176
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The strengthened Office of the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the new European External Action Service (EEAS) presuppose a set of interests and/or values that the European Union (EU) wishes to pursue on the world stage. But what are those interests and/or values and how does the EU reach agreement on them? Rather than simply 'cutting and pasting' from EU treaties and strategy papers, this article identifies seven distinct theoretical models of how the EU and its member states arrive collectively at a definition of their diplomatic objectives. The seven models include intergovernmentalist models of veto threats and log-rolling, normative institutionalist models of cooperative bargaining and entrapment, and constructivist and sociological institutionalist models of elite socialization, Europeanization and collective identity formation. The article identifies the logics of each model and notes their implications for the role of the EU's new foreign policy institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 29
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   Normal Power Europe: Non-Proliferation and the Normalization of EU's Foreign Policy [J].
Pardo, Ramon Pacheco .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2012, 34 (01) :1-18
[22]   Appeasement or solidarity? Uncovering the drivers of European public opinion on the EU's foreign policy [J].
Moise, Alexandru D. ;
Wang, Chendi .
EUROPEAN UNION POLITICS, 2025, 26 (02) :418-441
[23]   Between national and European foreign policy: the role of Latvia and Romania in the EU's policy towards Central Asia [J].
Bossuyt, Fabienne .
SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN AND BLACK SEA STUDIES, 2017, 17 (03) :441-460
[24]   Analysing the Power of the European Union's Diplomatic Service: Do the EU Member States Control the European External Action Service? [J].
Kostanyan, Hrant .
HAGUE JOURNAL OF DIPLOMACY, 2016, 11 (01) :26-48
[25]   A Retrospective View on the Union's Cultural Policy: The Commission's Objectives in Distributing Project Funds across Europe's Creative Industries [J].
Mitter, Birgit .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2025, 47 (03) :361-382
[26]   The Mercosur-European Union agreements seen from the perspective of Argentina's foreign policy [J].
Simonoff, Alejandro .
ICONOS, 2020, 24 (68) :57-73
[27]   Not Just hydrocarbons: Japan’s multifaceted foreign policy approaches towards the GCC states [J].
Kazuto Matsuda ;
Nikolay Kozhanov .
International Politics, 2023, 60 (6) :1248-1269
[28]   Not Just hydrocarbons: Japan's multifaceted foreign policy approaches towards the GCC states [J].
Matsuda, Kazuto ;
Kozhanov, Nikolay .
INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, 2023, 60 (06) :1248-1269
[29]   WAS NIGERIA'S OFFERING OF ASYLUM STATUS TO PRESIDENT CHARLES TAYLOR OF LIBERIA A DIPLOMATIC BLUNDER? A FOREIGN POLICY CASE REVIEW [J].
Ngara, Christopher Ochanja .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES-JIS, 2022, 18 :63-87
[30]   Canada's Implementation of the UN Global Compacts on Migration and Refugees: Advancing Foreign Policy Objectives and the Status Quo? [J].
Atak, Idil ;
Linley-Moore, Claire ;
Kim, Julie .
REFUGEE SURVEY QUARTERLY, 2023, 42 (04) :453-474