An on-site dosimetry audit for high-energy electron beams

被引:11
作者
de Prez, Leon [1 ]
Heukelom, Stan [2 ]
Jansen, Bartel [1 ]
Jansen, Wim [3 ,4 ]
van de Kamer, Jeroen [5 ]
van Klink, Wenze [2 ,6 ]
Kok, Elfried [3 ,4 ]
Perik, Thijs [5 ]
de Pooter, Jacco [1 ]
Wittkamper, Frits [5 ]
机构
[1] VSL Dutch Metrol Inst, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Reinier Graaf, Delft, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Mobius Med Syst Int, Haastrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Absorbed dose to water; Audit; Code of practice; Dosimetry; Electron beam; Radiation therapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2018.02.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: External dosimetry audits are powerful quality assurance instruments for radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to implement an electron dosimetry audit based on a contemporary code of practice within the requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests. This involved the determination of suitable acceptance criteria based on thorough uncertainty analyses. Materials and methods: Subject of the audit was the determination of absorbed dose to water, D-w, and the beam quality specifier, R-50,R-dos. Fifteen electron beams were measured in four institutes according to the Belgian-Dutch code of practice for high-energy electron beams. The expanded uncertainty (k=2) for the D-w values was 3.6% for a Roos chamber calibrated in Co-60 and 3.2% for a Roos chamber cross-calibrated against a Farmer chamber. The expanded uncertainty for the beam quality specifier, R-50,R-dos, was 0.14 cm. The audit acceptance levels were based on the expanded uncertainties for the comparison results and estimated to be 2.4%. Results: The audit was implemented and validated successfully. All D-w audit results were satisfactory with differences in D-w values mostly smaller than 0.5% and always smaller than 1%. Except for one, differences in R-50,R-dos were smaller than 0.2 cm and always smaller than 0.3 cm. Conclusions: An electron dosimetry audit based on absorbed dose to water and present-day requirements for calibration laboratories performing proficiency tests was successfully implemented. It proved international traceability of the participants value with an uncertainty better than 3.6% (k=2).
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Aalbers AHL, 2008, 18 NCS, DOI [10.25030/ncs-18, DOI 10.25030/NCS-18]
[2]  
Andreo P., 2000, INT AT ENERGY AGENCY, V18, P35
[3]  
Bichsel H, 1979, 31 ICRU, V31, DOI [10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004]
[4]  
de Prez LA, 28 NCS
[5]   Inter-departmental dosimetry audits u development of methods and lessons learned [J].
Eaton, David J. ;
Bolton, Steve ;
Thomas, Russell A. S. ;
Clark, Catharine H. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 40 (04) :183-189
[6]  
ISO/IEC, 2005, 170252005E ISOIEC
[7]  
ISO/IEC, 2010, 170432010IDT ISOIEC
[8]  
JOHANSSON KA, 1982, ACTA RADIOL ONCOL, V21, P1
[9]   Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement: Point/counterpoint [J].
Lequin, RM .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 50 (05) :977-978
[10]   Examining the influence of humidity on reference ionization chamber performance [J].
McEwen, Malcolm R. ;
Taank, Jaswinder .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (02) :694-702