The Feasibility and Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in Rectal Cancer

被引:0
作者
Thorn, Christopher Charles [1 ]
Mathur, Pawan [1 ]
Elton, Colin [1 ]
机构
[1] Barnet Gen Hosp, Wellhouse Lane, London EN5 3DJ, Hertfordshire, England
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Rectal cancer Total mesorectal excision; Circumferential resection margin; Anastomotic dehiscence; Local recurrence; Disease-free survival; Overall survival Functional outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s11888-010-0076-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The use of the laparoscopic approach for the treatment of rectal tumors remains controversial. This review summarizes all the published level 1 and some level 2 evidence, much of which is not included in recent meta-analyses. The current evidence base demonstrates short-term benefits in the laparoscopic group without compromising 35 year survival or recurrence. Quality-of-life indices demonstrate benefits until 1 year but not beyond. Further randomized clinical trials are required to investigate the impact on lymph node yield and genitourinary function, and a minimum dataset might be helpful for the design of future studies. We conclude that the laparoscopic approach is both feasible and desirable in the context of a well-trained surgeon and has a clear role in the management rectal cancer in all but emergent and T4 cases.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Araujo Sergio Eduardo Alonso, 2003, Rev. Hosp. Clin., V58, P133, DOI 10.1590/S0041-87812003000300002
  • [2] Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Aziz, O
    Constantinides, V
    Tekkis, PP
    Athanasiou, T
    Purkayastha, S
    Paraskeva, P
    Darzi, AW
    Heriot, AG
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) : 413 - 424
  • [3] Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial
    Baik, S. H.
    Ko, Y. T.
    Kang, C. M.
    Lee, W. J.
    Kim, N. K.
    Sohn, S. K.
    Chi, H. S.
    Cho, C. H.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (07): : 1601 - 1608
  • [4] Bianchi PP, 2010, ROBOTIC VERSUS LAPAR
  • [5] Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: Outcome and cost-benefit analysis
    Braga, Marco
    Frasson, Matteo
    Vignali, Andrea
    Zuliani, Walter
    Capretti, Giovanni
    Di Carlo, Valerio
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (04) : 464 - 471
  • [6] The oncological safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with sphincter preservation for rectal carcinoma
    Bretagnol, F
    Lelong, B
    Laurent, C
    Moutardier, V
    Rullier, A
    Monges, G
    Delpero, JR
    Rullier, E
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (07): : 892 - 896
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
    Breukink, S.
    Pierie, J.
    Wiggers, T.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (04):
  • [8] Chambers W, 2010, COMPLEX COLORECTAL S
  • [9] Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery
    den Dulk, M.
    Marijnen, C. A. M.
    Collette, L.
    Putter, H.
    Pahlman, L.
    Folkesson, J.
    Bosset, J. -F.
    Roedel, C.
    Bujko, K.
    van de Velde, C. J. H.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (09) : 1066 - 1075
  • [10] Laparoscopic rectal resection with anal sphincter preservation for rectal cancer - Long-term outcome
    Dulucq, JL
    Wintringer, P
    Stabilini, C
    Mahajna, A
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (11): : 1468 - 1474