Contrasting identities: a language teacher's practice in an English for Specific Purposes classroom

被引:3
作者
Okada, Yusuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Language & Culture, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan
关键词
identity; epistemics; English for specific purposes; conversation analysis; teacher training;
D O I
10.1080/19463014.2014.961092
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
For language teachers who are concerned about referring to their own and students' identities other than in the roles of 'teacher' and 'student' in the classroom, this conversation analytic study aims to give insights into the use of identity. Detailed analysis of the data of English for a Specific Purpose ( ESP) classrooms indicates that contrasting the teacher's and students' non-default situated identities, such as senpai ('senior' in English) with kohai ('junior' in English) and sociologist with scientist, is a way for the language teacher to perform the role of 'teacher' effectively in ESP classrooms: the practice constructs an epistemic gradient among the teacher and the students and makes some actions accountable by the participants, who is ascribed a superior epistemic status with an identity. The study concludes with a discussion of the contribution the use of identity can make to ESP/LSP (language for specific purposes) and suggestions for ESP/LSP course development.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 87
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Antaki C., 1998, IDENTITIES TALK
[2]  
Belcher D., 2009, ENGL SPECIF PURP, P1
[3]  
Benesch S., 2001, CRITICAL ENGLISH ACA
[4]   WHY THAT NOW - 2 KINDS OF CONVERSATIONAL MEANING [J].
BILMES, J .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1985, 8 (03) :319-355
[5]  
BRAINE George, 1999, NONNATIVE ED ENGLISH
[6]  
Clarke M, 2008, NEW PERSP LANG EDUC, V8, P1
[7]  
GARFINKEL H, 2002, ETHNOMETHODOLOGY PRO
[8]  
Hauser E., 2003, THESIS
[9]   Generalization: A Practice of Situated Categorization in Talk [J].
Hauser, Eric .
HUMAN STUDIES, 2011, 34 (02) :183-198
[10]   Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge [J].
Heritage, John .
RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION, 2012, 45 (01) :1-29