The chimney-graft technique for preserving supra-aortic branches: a review

被引:76
作者
Moulakakis, Konstantinos G. [1 ,2 ]
Mylonas, Spyridon N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dalainas, Ilias [1 ]
Sfyroeras, George S. [1 ]
Markatis, Fotis [1 ]
Kotsis, Thomas [3 ]
Kakisis, John [1 ]
Liapis, Christos D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Attikon Univ Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Athens, Greece
[2] Collaborat Res CORE Grp, Systemat Review Unit, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Aretaie Hosp, Vasc Unit,Clin Surg 2, Athens, Greece
关键词
Chimney; snorkel; endovascular; aortic arch;
D O I
10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.05.14
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Evolution in the endovascular era has influenced the management of aortic arch pathologies. "Chimney" or "snorkel" graft technique has been used as an alternative in high risk patients unfit for open repair. We reviewed the published literature on the chimney graft technique for preservation of the supra-aortic branches in order to provide an extensive insight of its feasibility and efficacy and investigate its outcomes. 18 reports were identified, with a total of 124 patients and 136 chimney. Primary technical success was achieved in 123/124 patients (99.2%). The perioperative mortality rate was 4.8% and the stroke rate was 4%, while events of spinal cord ischemia were rare. The overall endoleak rate was 18.5%; 13 patients (10.5%) developed a type I endoleak and 10 (8%) patients a type II endoleak. During a median follow-up period of 11.4 months (range, 0.87-20.1 months) all implanted chimney grafts remained patent. From this, we conclude that endovascular aortic arch repair with chimney grafts is associated with a lower mortality rate compared to totally open or hybrid reconstruction. However, the stroke rate remains noteworthy, and requires longterm data to elucidate.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 346
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Initial Experience of Chimney Technique in Case of Aortic Arch Pathologies Involving the Supra-Aortic Branches [J].
Akchurin, Renat ;
Imaev, Timur ;
Komlev, Alexey ;
Lepilin, Peter ;
Osmanov, Midat ;
Kolegaev, Alexander ;
Pokidkin, Ilya .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (17) :B37-B37
[2]  
Antoniou GA, 2012, INT ANGIOL, V31, P595
[3]  
Azuma T, 2013, EUR J CARDIOTHORAC S
[4]   What is the Best Method for Brain Protection in Surgery of the Aortic Arch? Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion [J].
Bachet, Jean .
CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2010, 28 (02) :389-+
[5]   Double-Barrel Technique for Preservation of Aortic Arch Branches During Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair [J].
Baldwin, Z. K. ;
Chuter, T. A. M. ;
Hiramoto, J. S. ;
Reilly, L. M. ;
Schneider, D. B. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 22 (06) :703-709
[6]  
Chang G, 2013, J VASC SURG
[7]   Endovascular debranching of the aortic arch during thoracic endograft repair [J].
Cires, Giancarlo ;
Noll, Robert E., Jr. ;
Albuquerque, Francisco C., Jr. ;
Tonnessen, Britt H. ;
Sternbergh, W. Charles, III .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 (06) :1485-1491
[8]  
Coselli JS, 2009, TEX HEART I J, V36, P435
[9]   A percutaneous technique for preservation of arch branch patency during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR): Retrograde catheterization and stenting [J].
Criado, Frank J. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (01) :54-58
[10]   Targeting Landing Zone 0 by Total Arch Rerouting and TEVAR: Midterm Results of a Transcontinental Registry [J].
Czerny, Martin ;
Weigang, Ernst ;
Sodeck, Gottfried ;
Schmidli, Juerg ;
Antona, Carlo ;
Gelpi, Guido ;
Friess, Tanja ;
Klocker, Josef ;
Szeto, Wilson Y. ;
Moeller, Patrick ;
Pochettino, Alberto ;
Bavaria, Joseph E. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 94 (01) :84-89