EVOLUTION IN HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS - EFFECTS OF MIGRATION ON HABITAT SPECIALIZATION

被引:158
作者
BROWN, JS
PAVLOVIC, NB
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, 60680, IL
关键词
HABITAT SELECTION; MIGRATION; ESS; FITNESS SET; FREQUENCY-DEPENDENT SELECTION; EVOLUTION OF SPECIALIZATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; ADAPTIVE SURFACE;
D O I
10.1007/BF02270698
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Richard Levins introduced fitness sets as a tool for investigating evolution within heterogeneous environments. Evolutionary game theory permits a synthesis and generalization of this approach by considering the evolutionary response of organisms to any scale of habitat heterogeneity. As scales of heterogeneity increase from fine to coarse, the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS) switches from a single generalist species to several species that become increasingly specialized on distinct habitats. Depending upon the organisms' ecology, the switch from one to two species may occur at high migration rates (relatively fine-grained environment), or may only occur at very low migration rates (coarse-grained environment). At the ESS, the evolutionary context of a species is the entire landscape, while its ecological context may be a single habitat. Evolution towards the ESS can be represented with adaptive landscapes. In the absence of frequency-dependence, shifting from a single strategy ESS to a two strategy ESS poses the problem of evolving across valleys in the adaptive surface to occupy new peaks (hence, Sewell Wright's shifting balance theory). Frequency-dependent processes facilitate evolution across valleys. If a system with a two strategy ESS is constrained to possess a single strategy, the population may actually evolve a strategy that minimizes fitness. Because the population now rests at the bottom of a valley, evolution by natural selection can drive populations to occupy both peaks.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 382
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Holt R.D., Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution, Theor. Pop. Biol., 28, pp. 181-208, (1985)
  • [12] Holt R.D., Gaines M.S., Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches, Evol. Ecol., 6, pp. 433-47, (1992)
  • [13] Kotler B.P., Brown J.S., Environmental heterogeneity and the coexistence of desert rodents, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, pp. 281-307, (1988)
  • [14] Lawlor L.R., Maynard Smith J., The coevolution and stability of competing species, The American Naturalist, 110, pp. 79-99, (1976)
  • [15] Levin S., Cohen D., Hastings A., Dispersal strategies in patchy environments, Theor. Pop. Biol., 26, pp. 165-91, (1984)
  • [16] Levins R., Theory of fitnesses in a heterogeneous environment, I. The fitness set and adaptive function, The American Naturalist, 96, pp. 361-78, (1962)
  • [17] Levins R., Evolution in Changing Environments, (1968)
  • [18] Matsuda H., Namba T., Co-evolutionarily stable community structure in a patchy environment, J. Theor. Biol., 136, pp. 229-43, (1989)
  • [19] Maynard Smith J., Price G.R., The logic of animal conflict, Nature (London), 246, pp. 15-18, (1973)
  • [20] Morris D.W., Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes, Evol. Ecol., 6, pp. 412-32, (1992)