ON THE OPTIMALITY OF PACKET-ORIENTED SCHEDULING IN PHOTONIC SWITCHES WITH DELAY LINES

被引:3
|
作者
Rogiest, Wouter [1 ,2 ]
De Turck, Koen [1 ]
Laevens, Koenraad [1 ]
Fiems, Dieter [1 ,2 ]
Wittevrongel, Sabine [1 ]
Bruneel, Herwig [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Telecommun & Informat Proc, St Pietersnieuwstr 41, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Res Fdn Flanders FWO Vlaanderen, Brussels, Belgium
来源
关键词
Performance evaluation; Markov decision processes; optical networks; queueing theory; FDL buffers;
D O I
10.3934/naco.2011.1.727
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Addressing the bandwidth inefficiency problem of current IP over DWDM backbone switching, Optical Packet/Burst Switching (OPS/OBS) provide viable solutions, capitalizing on statistical multiplexing gain, through packet-oriented scheduling. To resolve packet/burst contention, the involved photonic switches contain wavelength converters and fiber delay lines, controlled through a channel and delay selection (CDS) algorithm. Recently proposed CDS algorithms all rely on heuristics, of which the optimality is unexamined to date. This paper presents an in-depth analysis of the optimality of CDS algorithms. Methodologically, we rely on Markov chain analysis for performance evaluation, combined with a discrete Markov Decision Process formulation of the optimization problem, optimized for fast calculation, allowing to determine the exact optimum of a specific given setting of the switch, through numerical algebra solution techniques. Results point out that, for the basic switch setting assumed, of all known CDS algorithms, an algorithm called MING (MINimal Gap) is close to optimal, but never strictly optimal. Various graphs support this, showing that an algorithm optimal for any traffic load cannot (in general) be devised. Results for several other switch settings further confirm this, showing how known CDS algorithms might be modified, to attain improved control robustness.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 747
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Programmable peak-rate Gigabit shaper supporting ATM and packet-oriented traffic
    Charopoulos, C
    Leligou, N
    Stassinopoulos, G
    Kornaros, G
    Orphanoudakis, T
    CCCT 2003, VOL6, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES: III, 2003, : 18 - 23
  • [32] Packet-Oriented Communication Protocols for Smart Grid Services over Low-Speed PLC
    Bauer, Michael
    Plappert, Wolfgang
    Wang, Chong
    Dostert, Klaus
    ISPLC: 2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON POWER LINE COMMUNICATIONS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 89 - 94
  • [33] Packet scheduling with delay and loss differentiation
    Striegel, A
    Manimaran, G
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2002, 25 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [34] Bounded delay scheduling with packet dependencies
    Markovitch, Michael
    Scalosub, Gabriel
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 182 : 98 - 109
  • [35] A scheduling algorithm for packet delay differentiation
    Mase, K
    Ohara, K
    Nogami, S
    Karasawa, N
    ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN PART I-COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 87 (03): : 87 - 97
  • [36] Bounded Delay Scheduling with Packet Dependencies
    Markovitch, Michael
    Scalosub, Gabriel
    2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2014, : 257 - 262
  • [37] Packet mode scheduling in buffered crossbar (CICQ) switches
    Passas, Georgios
    Katevenis, Manolis
    HPSR: 2006 WORKSHOP ON HIGH PERFORMANCE SWITCHING AND ROUTING, 2006, : 105 - +
  • [38] Fast scheduling for optical packet switches with minimum configurations
    Zhou, Z
    Li, X
    Hamdi, M
    2005 WORKSHOP ON HIGH PERFORMANCE SWITCHING AND ROUTING, 2005, : 207 - 211
  • [39] The New MSMPS Packet Scheduling Algorithm for VOQ Switches
    Danilewicz, Grzegorz
    Dziuba, Marcin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, NETWORKS & DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING (CSNDSP), 2012,
  • [40] Online Packet Scheduling for CIOQ and Buffered Crossbar Switches
    Kamal Al-Bawani
    Matthias Englert
    Matthias Westermann
    Algorithmica, 2018, 80 : 3861 - 3888