OUTCOME OF PLANNED HOME BIRTHS IN AN INNER-CITY PRACTICE

被引:20
作者
FORD, C [1 ]
ILIFFE, S [1 ]
FRANKLIN, O [1 ]
机构
[1] WHITTINGTON HOSP,DEPT PRIMARY HLTH CARE,LONDON N19 5NF,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.303.6816.1517
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective - To assess the outcome of pregnancy for women booking for home births in an inner London practice between 1977 and 1989. Design - Retrospective review of practice obstetric records. Setting - A general practice in London. Subjects - 285 women registered with the practice or referred by neighbouring general practitioners or local community midwives. Main outcome measures - Place of birth and number of cases transferred to specialist care before, during, and after labour. Results - Of 285 women who booked for home births, eight left the practice area before the onset of labour, giving a study population of 277 women. Six had spontaneous abortions, 26 were transferred to specialist care during pregnancy, another 26 were transferred during labour, and four were transferred in the postpartum period. 215 women (77.6%, 95% confidence interval 72.7 to 82.5) had normal births at home without needing specialist help. Transfer to specialist care during pregnancy was not significantly related to parity, but nulliparous women were significantly more likely to require transfer during labour (p = 0.00002). Postnatal complications requiring specialist attention were uncommon among mothers delivered at home (four cases) and rare among their babies (three cases). Conclusions - Birth at home is practical and safe for a self selected population of multiparous women, but nulliparous women are more likely to require transfer to hospital during labour because of delay in labour. Close cooperation between the general practitioner and both community midwives and hospital obstetricians is important in minimising the risks of trial of labour at home.
引用
收藏
页码:1517 / 1519
页数:3
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] OBSTACLES TO ACCEPTANCE OF CLINICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS
    BALLA, JI
    ELSTEIN, AS
    CHRISTENSEN, C
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 298 (6673) : 579 - 582
  • [2] INCONSISTENCIES IN CLINICAL DECISIONS IN OBSTETRICS
    BARRETT, JFR
    JARVIS, GJ
    MACDONALD, HN
    BUCHAN, PC
    TYRRELL, SN
    LILFORD, RJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1990, 336 (8714) : 549 - 551
  • [3] GENERAL-PRACTITIONER OBSTETRICS IN BRADFORD
    BRYCE, FC
    CLAYTON, JK
    RAND, RJ
    BECK, I
    FARQUHARSON, DIM
    JONES, SE
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6726) : 725 - 727
  • [4] CAMBELL R, 1984, BMJ, V289, P721
  • [5] CHAMBERLAIN G, 1988, PRACTITIONER, V232, P771
  • [6] REVIEW OF MATERNITY PATIENTS SUITABLE FOR HOME DELIVERY
    DIXON, EA
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6331) : 1753 - 1755
  • [7] FRANCIS RB, 1984, AM J NEPHROL, V4, P43
  • [8] JENKINSON S, 1990, BRIT MED J, V301, P664
  • [9] GENERAL-PRACTITIONER OBSTETRICS
    JEWELL, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 298 (6675) : 690 - 691
  • [10] GENERAL-PRACTITIONER OBSTETRICS IN BRADFORD
    JEWELL, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 300 (6732) : 1140 - 1140