COMPARISON OF DIRECTIGEN FLU-A WITH VIRAL ISOLATION AND DIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE FOR THE RAPID DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENZA-A VIRUS

被引:87
作者
WANER, JL
TODD, SJ
SHALABY, H
MURPHY, P
WALL, LV
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.29.3.479-482.1991
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Directigen FLU-A, an enzyme immunoassay membrane test, was compared prospectively to isolation in cell culture and direct immunofluorescence (IF) for the detection of influenza A virus. One hundred ninety specimens were evaluated by Directigen FLU-A and cell culture; 184 of these specimens were also tested by direct IF. The sensitivity of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation in cell culture and direct IF was 100%. The specificities of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation and direct IF were identical, 91.6%. Fourteen specimens that were positive by Directigen FLU-A did not yield virus in culture; two of the specimens, however, were positive by direct IF, and four other specimens were not specimens of choice for the test. A positive Directigen result had positive predictive values of 62.6 and 75.0% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively; a positive Directigen result with an intensity reading of 2+ or greater, however, had positive predictive values of 85 and 100% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively. In all comparisons, the negative predictive value was 100%. There was no evidence that cross-reactivity occurred with non-influenza A antigens. Directigen FLU-A should serve as a convenient screening test for influenza A and as a rapid test supported by isolation in cell culture during an influenza outbreak.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 482
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BERG RA, 1980, LANCET, V2, P851
[2]  
DAISY JA, 1979, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V9, P688
[3]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF AMANTADINE AND RIMANTADINE IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF INFLUENZA-A INFECTION [J].
DOLIN, R ;
REICHMAN, RC ;
MADORE, HP ;
MAYNARD, R ;
LINTON, PN ;
WEBBERJONES, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 307 (10) :580-584
[4]   RAPID DETECTION OF INFLUENZA-VIRUS BY SHELL VIAL ASSAY WITH MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES [J].
ESPY, MJ ;
SMITH, TF ;
HARMON, MW ;
KENDAL, AP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1986, 24 (04) :677-679
[5]   COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TISSUE-CULTURES FOR ISOLATION AND QUANTITATION OF INFLUENZA AND PARA-INFLUENZA VIRUSES [J].
FRANK, AL ;
COUCH, RB ;
GRIFFIS, CA ;
BAXTER, BD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1979, 10 (01) :32-36
[6]   RAPID VIRAL DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY-INFECTIONS - COMPARISON OF ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY AND THE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE FOR DETECTION OF VIRAL-ANTIGENS IN NASOPHARYNGEAL SECRETIONS [J].
GRANDIEN, M ;
PETTERSSON, CA ;
GARDNER, PS ;
LINDE, A ;
STANTON, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (05) :757-760
[7]   SELECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AND PROCEDURES - PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS [J].
GRINER, PF ;
MAYEWSKI, RJ ;
MUSHLIN, AI ;
GREENLAND, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 94 (04) :553-+
[8]  
HALL CB, 1987, PEDIATRICS, V80, P275
[9]  
Harmon M., 1989, DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE, P631
[10]   ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR DIRECT DETECTION OF INFLUENZA TYPE-A AND ADENOVIRUS ANTIGENS IN CLINICAL SPECIMENS [J].
HARMON, MW ;
PAWLIK, KM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1982, 15 (01) :5-11