BINOCULAR INTERACTIONS AND STEADY-STATE VEPS - A STUDY IN NORMAL AND DETECTIVE BINOCULAR VISION .2.

被引:5
作者
BAGOLINI, B
FALSINI, B
CERMOLA, S
PORCIATTI, V
机构
[1] CNR,INST NEUROPHYSIOL,I-56127 PISA,ITALY
[2] CATHOLIC UNIV,EYE CLIN,I-00168 ROME,ITALY
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00184277
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background: Recent evidence indicates that an index of binocular activity may be found in some properties of steady-state visual evoked potentials (VEPs), such as amplitude facilitation and phase shortening. We evaluated binocular interactions with steady-state VEPs in normal subjects as well as in patients with concomitant strabismus and defective binocular vision. Methods: Steady-state (8-Hz) VEPs to counterphased sinusoidal gratings (1.2 c/deg spatial frequency) of low contrast (3.2%) were recorded in 19 esotropic patients and in 18 age-matched controls. Patients had either anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC, n=10) or suppression (n=9) in casual seeing conditions (striated glasses). In all subjects, both binocular and monocular VEPs displayed a major component at twice the stimulation frequency (second harmonic), whose amplitude and phase were measured. A binocular interaction index was obtained by comparing binocular VEPs (BVEPs) with the sum (vectorial) of the two monocular VEPs (SMVEPs). Results: In normal subjects, BVEPs were larger in amplitude than SMVEPs (facilitation), and shortened in latency (phase). On average, both ARC and suppression patients displayed loss in amplitude facilitation and absence of phase shortening. However, 50% of ARC patients showed clear VEP facilitation. In both ARC and suppression patients, the amplitude ratio BVEP/SMVEP was negatively correlated with the amount of the angle of deviation. Conclusion: These results suggest that losses in amplitude facilitation and phase shortening of binocular steady-state VEPs reflect abnormal binocular interactions associated with different forms of sensorial adaptation in concomitant strabismus.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 744
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AMIGO G, 1978, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V17, P910
[2]   BINOCULARITY IN THE HUMAN VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIAL - FACILITATION, SUMMATION AND SUPPRESSION [J].
APKARIAN, PA ;
NAKAYAMA, K ;
TYLER, CW .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 51 (01) :32-48
[3]   OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF SENSORIAL AND SENSORIMOTORIAL STATUS IN ESOTROPIA - THEIR IMPORTANCE IN SURGICAL PROGNOSIS [J].
BAGOLINI, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1985, 69 (10) :725-728
[4]   ANOMALOUS CORRESPONDENCE - DEFINITION AND DIAGNOSTIC METHODS [J].
BAGOLINI, B .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1967, 23 :346-&
[5]   BINOCULAR INTERACTION AND STEADY-STATE VISUAL EVOKED-POTENTIALS .1. A STUDY IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN SUBJECTS WITH DEFECTIVE BINOCULAR VISION [J].
BAGOLINI, B ;
PORCIATTI, V ;
FALSINI, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1988, 226 (05) :401-406
[6]   PRACTICAL USEFULNESS OF ANOMALOUS BINOCULAR VISION FOR THE STRABISMIC PATIENT [J].
BAGOLINI, B ;
CAMPOS, EC .
INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1983, 6 (01) :19-26
[7]   SENSORY ANOMALIES IN STRABISMUS - (SUPPRESSION, ANOMALOUS CORRESPONDENCE, AMBLYOPIA) .1. [J].
BAGOLINI, B .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1976, 41 (01) :1-22
[8]  
BAGOLINI B, 1991, CHANGING VISUAL SYST, P269
[9]   BINOCULARITY IN COMITANT STRABISMUS .2. OBJECTIVE EVALUATION WITH VISUAL EVOKED-RESPONSES [J].
CAMPOS, EC ;
CHIESI, C .
DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1983, 55 (04) :277-293
[10]  
CRAWFORD MLJ, 1984, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V19, P1105